Hearing Preservation Outcomes After Cochlear Implantation Depending on the Angle of Insertion: Indication for Electric or Electric-Acoustic Stimulation.

OBJECTIVE

This study reviewed outcomes of hearing preservation (HP) surgery depending on the angle of insertion (AOI) in a cochlear implant (CI) patient population who used electric stimulation (ES) or combined electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS).

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case review.

SETTING

Tertiary referral university hospital.

PATIENTS

Ninety-one patients with different degrees of preoperative low-frequency residual hearing who underwent HP surgery with a free-fitting lateral-wall electrode array (MED-EL Flex) with lengths ranging from 20.0 to 31.5 mm.

INTERVENTION

Cochlear implantation using HP surgery technique and subsequent fitting with CI speech processor for ES, or combined CI and hearing aid speech processor for EAS.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Individual AOI were estimated using modified Stenvers' projection. Freiburg monosyllable test in quiet (free-field presentation at 65 dB SPL) and pure-tone averages for low frequencies (125, 250, and 500 Hz; PTAlow) were evaluated during a follow-up period of 12 months after implantation.

RESULTS

Estimated AOIs showed bimodal distribution: shallow insertion (SI) with mean AOI of 377 degrees and deep insertion (DI) with mean AOI of 608 degrees. Speech test scores after 12 months were comparable between AOI groups, however, they were significantly different between stimulation types with better scores for EAS. Only ES showed a positive correlation (r = 0.293) between speech test score and AOI. When HP was possible, both SI and DI showed significant postoperative PTAlow shifts with mean of 17.8 and 21.6 dB, respectively. These were comparable between AOI groups and no significant shifts were observed in follow-up intervals. Audiometric indication for HP and subsequent EAS is proposed up to 65 dB HL at 500 Hz, and up to 87 dB HL for HP.

CONCLUSIONS

CI candidates can benefit from HP surgery with deep insertion when only using ES due to insufficient residual hearing. Conversely, candidates with preoperative threshold up to 65 dB HL at 500 Hz could perform significantly better with EAS which requires shallow insertion.