Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4.
Department of Psychology, Faculty of Arts, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada T2N 1N4
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2018 Aug 5;373(1752). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2017.0138.
words refer to concepts that cannot be directly experienced through our senses (e.g. , ). How we ground the meanings of abstract words is one of the deepest problems in cognitive science today. We investigated this question in an experiment in which 62 participants were asked to communicate the meanings of words (20 abstract nouns, e.g. ; 10 concrete nouns, e.g. ) to a partner without using the words themselves (the taboo task). We analysed the speech and associated gestures that participants used to communicate the meaning of each word in the taboo task. Analysis of verbal and gestural data yielded a number of insights. When communicating about the meanings of abstract words, participants' speech referenced more people and introspections. In contrast, the meanings of concrete words were communicated by referencing more objects and entities. Gesture results showed that when participants spoke about abstract word meanings their speech was accompanied by more metaphorical and beat gestures, and speech about concrete word meanings was accompanied by more iconic gestures. Taken together, the results suggest that abstract meanings are best captured by a model that allows dynamic access to multiple representation systems.This article is part of the theme issue 'Varieties of abstract concepts: development, use and representation in the brain'.
词语指的是无法通过我们的感官直接体验到的概念(例如,)。我们如何理解抽象词的含义是当今认知科学中最深奥的问题之一。我们在一项实验中研究了这个问题,该实验要求 62 名参与者向同伴传达词语的含义(20 个抽象名词,例如;10 个具体名词,例如),而不能使用这些词语本身(禁忌任务)。我们分析了参与者在禁忌任务中用于传达每个词语含义的言语和相关手势。对言语和手势数据的分析得出了一些见解。当参与者交流抽象词语的含义时,他们的言语更多地提到了人和内省。相比之下,具体词语的含义则通过更多地提到物体和实体来传达。手势结果表明,当参与者谈论抽象词的含义时,他们的言语伴随着更多的隐喻和节拍手势,而谈论具体词的含义时,则伴随着更多的形象手势。总的来说,这些结果表明,抽象含义最好通过允许动态访问多个表示系统的模型来捕捉。本文是主题为“抽象概念的多样性:大脑中的发展、使用和表现”的一部分。