Icahn School of Medicine, Mt. Sinai Hospital, Susan and Leonard Feinstein IBD Center, New York, New York, USA.
Dalhousie University and Memorial University of Newfoundland, Saint John Regional Hospital, Saint John, New Brunswick, Canada.
Inflamm Bowel Dis. 2019 Jan 1;25(1):142-149. doi: 10.1093/ibd/izy216.
Thiopurine metabolite monitoring to proactively dose optimize to achieve therapeutic levels has not been used consistently, and it is unclear if this would lead to better outcomes. We aimed to compare 6-month outcomes between standard and optimized dosing strategies and define long-term predictors of thiopurine durability.
Two hundred sixteen pediatric IBD patients with at least 2 6-thioguanine nucleotide (6-TGN) levels were grouped for analysis by start dose: >2.5 mg/kg/day AZA (group 1) or <2.5 mg/kg/day (group 2) and further subgrouped depending on whether dosing was optimized to achieve 6-TGN >235 pmol/8 × 108 RBC. The metabolites, 6TGN and 6MMP, were univariate and multivariate analyses tested associations among metabolite levels, laboratory data, and the primary outcome of 6-month steroid-free clinical remission (SFR) (HBI ≤4 for CD; partial Mayo Score [pMS] ≤2 for UC). Thiopurine durability was measured using Kaplan Maier survival analysis.
6-MP, azathioprine, pediatrics, therapeutic drug monitoring, pediatrics were measured a median 59 (43-76) days after initiation of thiopurine. Both dosing strategies led to similar initial 6-TGN levels (group 1 = median 209 [IQR: 155-272] with 25% of patients >235; group 2 = 196 [139-274] with 29% >235). Steroid-free clinical remission was achieved in 74% of the 180 still on thiopurines at 6 months. Start dose was not associated with 6-month SFR-73% in group 1 and 77% in group 2 within those on thiopurines at 6 months (P = 0.61). Fixed- and optimized-dosing subgroups had similar 6-month 6-TGN levels, SFR rate, and percentage 6-TGN > 235. Only 6-TGN level >235 at 6 months predicted thiopurine durability (3 years [1.7-7.7] vs 2.5 years [0.83-5]; log-rank P < 0.001), and this did not retain significant in a multivariate model. Initial dosing strategy, first 6-TGN level, 6-month SFR, 6MMP:6TGN ratio, and delta-MCV did not predict durability. The rate of adverse events was 22%.
Steroid-free clinical remission and 6-TGN levels at 6 months were no different between a standardized, fixed dosing strategy and a metabolite-driven, optimized dosing strategy.
主动优化剂量以达到治疗水平的硫嘌呤代谢物监测尚未得到一致应用,尚不清楚这是否会带来更好的结果。我们旨在比较标准和优化剂量策略之间的 6 个月结局,并确定硫嘌呤耐久性的长期预测因素。
我们将至少有 2 个 6-硫鸟嘌呤核苷酸(6-TGN)水平的 216 例儿科 IBD 患者分组进行分析,起始剂量为:>2.5mg/kg/天 AZA(组 1)或 <2.5mg/kg/天(组 2),并进一步根据是否优化剂量以达到 6-TGN >235pmol/8×108 RBC 进行亚组分析。使用单变量和多变量分析来测试代谢物水平、实验室数据与主要结局(6 个月无类固醇临床缓解(SFR)(CD 的 HBI≤4;UC 的部分 Mayo 评分[pMS]≤2))之间的关联。使用 Kaplan-Meier 生存分析来测量硫嘌呤的耐久性。
6-MP、硫唑嘌呤、儿科、治疗药物监测、儿科在开始使用硫嘌呤后中位数 59(43-76)天进行了测量。两种剂量策略都导致了相似的初始 6-TGN 水平(组 1=中位数 209[IQR:155-272],25%的患者>235;组 2=196[139-274],29%的患者>235)。在 6 个月时,仍在使用硫嘌呤的 180 例患者中有 74%达到了无类固醇的临床缓解。在 6 个月时,仍在使用硫嘌呤的患者中,起始剂量与 6 个月时的 SFR 无关-组 1 为 73%,组 2 为 77%(P=0.61)。固定剂量和优化剂量亚组的 6 个月 6-TGN 水平、SFR 率和 6-TGN>235 的百分比相似。只有 6 个月时的 6-TGN 水平>235 预测了硫嘌呤的耐久性(3 年[1.7-7.7]与 2.5 年[0.83-5];对数秩 P<0.001),并且这在多变量模型中没有显著意义。初始剂量策略、首 6-TGN 水平、6 个月 SFR、6MMP:6TGN 比值和 delta-MCV 均不能预测耐久性。不良事件发生率为 22%。
标准化、固定剂量策略与代谢物驱动、优化剂量策略之间,无类固醇的临床缓解和 6 个月时的 6-TGN 水平没有差异。