Zhao Ming, Chen Jia-Yi, Chu Yu-Dong, Zhu Ya-Bin, Luo Lin, Bu Shi-Zhong
Runliang Diabetes Laboratory, Diabetes Research Center, Ningbo University; Department of Public Health, Longsai Hospital, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Runliang Diabetes Laboratory, Diabetes Research Center, Ningbo University, Ningbo, Zhejiang Province, China.
Neural Regen Res. 2018 Jun;13(6):1087-1095. doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.233453.
To evaluate the efficacy of α-lipoic acid (ALA) plus epalrestat combination therapy in the treatment of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN).
The electronic databases of PubMed, Medline, Embase, the Cochrane Library, the Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, the Wanfang Database and the Chinese Biomedical Database were used to retrieve relevant studies without language restrictions. The search was conducted from the inception of each database to 7 October 2016. The key terms were (diabetic peripheral neuropathy or diabetic neuropathy or DPN) AND (α-lipoic acid or lipoic acid or thioctic acid) AND epalrestat.
All of the eligible studies met the following inclusion criteria: (1) Randomized controlled trials that compared efficacy and safety of epalrestat plus ALA combination therapy versus epalrestat or ALA monotherapy in patients with DPN. (2) The minimum duration of treatment was 2 weeks. (3) The DPN patients were diagnosed using the World Health Organization standardized type 2 diabetes mellitus and DPN criteria. (4) Studies contained at least one measure that could reflect the efficacy of the drug and nerve conduction velocities. Studies in which the control group used epalrestat or ALA combined with other drugs were excluded. Statistical analyses were performed using STATA software for meta-analysis.
The primary outcomes were the therapeutic efficacy, median motor nerve conduction velocity (MNCV), median sensory nerve conduction velocity (SNCV), peroneal MNCV and peroneal SNCV.
Twenty studies with 1894 DPN patients were included, including 864 patients in the ALA plus epalrestat group, 473 in the ALA group and 557 in the epalrestat group. The efficacy of ALA plus epalrestat combination therapy was superior to ALA and epalrestat monotherapies (RR = 1.29, 95% CI: 1.21-1.38; RR = 1.43, 95% CI: 1.34-1.54, respectively). ALA plus epalrestat combination therapy also significantly improved median MNCV (WMD = 5.41, 95% CI: 2.07-8.75), median SNCV (WMD = 5.87, 95% CI: 1.52-10.22), peroneal MNCV (WMD = 5.59, 95% CI: 2.70-8.47) and peroneal SNCV (WMD = 4.57, 95% CI: 2.46-6.68).
: ALA plus epalrestat combination therapy was superior to ALA and epalrestat monotherapies for clinical efficacy and nerve conduction velocities in patients with DPN.
评估α-硫辛酸(ALA)联合依帕司他治疗糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)的疗效。
使用PubMed、Medline、Embase、Cochrane图书馆、中国知网、万方数据库和中国生物医学数据库等电子数据库检索相关研究,无语言限制。检索时间从各数据库建库至2016年10月7日。检索关键词为(糖尿病周围神经病变或糖尿病神经病变或DPN)AND(α-硫辛酸或硫辛酸或二硫辛酸)AND依帕司他。
所有符合条件的研究均满足以下纳入标准:(1)比较依帕司他联合ALA治疗与依帕司他或ALA单药治疗DPN患者疗效和安全性的随机对照试验。(2)最短治疗时长为2周。(3)DPN患者依据世界卫生组织标准化2型糖尿病及DPN标准进行诊断。(4)研究至少包含一项可反映药物疗效及神经传导速度的指标。排除对照组使用依帕司他或ALA联合其他药物的研究。使用STATA软件进行统计分析以进行荟萃分析。
主要观察指标为治疗效果、正中运动神经传导速度(MNCV)、正中感觉神经传导速度(SNCV)、腓总神经MNCV和腓总神经SNCV。
纳入20项研究,共1894例DPN患者,其中ALA联合依帕司他组864例,ALA组473例,依帕司他组557例。ALA联合依帕司他治疗的疗效优于ALA及依帕司他单药治疗(RR分别为1.29,95%CI:1.21 - 1.38;RR为1.43,95%CI:1.34 - 1.54)。ALA联合依帕司他治疗还显著改善了正中MNCV(WMD = 5.41,95%CI:2.07 - 8.75)、正中SNCV(WMD = 5.87,95%CI:1.52 - 10.22)、腓总神经MNCV(WMD = 5.59,95%CI:2.70 - 8.47)和腓总神经SNCV(WMD = 4.57,95%CI:2.46 - 6.68)。
ALA联合依帕司他治疗在DPN患者的临床疗效及神经传导速度方面优于ALA及依帕司他单药治疗。