Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Seoul Metropolitan Government Seoul National University Boramae Medical Centre, Seoul, Korea.
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2018 Oct;62(9):1223-1228. doi: 10.1111/aas.13169. Epub 2018 Jun 21.
The cricothyroid membrane is the most commonly accessed location for invasive surgical airway. Although the laryngeal handshake method is recommended for identifying the cricothyroid membrane, there is no clinical data regarding the utility of the laryngeal handshake method in cricothyroid membrane identification. The objective of this study was to compare the accuracy of cricothyroid membrane identification between the laryngeal handshake method and simple palpation.
After anaesthesia induction, the otorhinolaryngology resident and anaesthesia resident identified and marked the needle insertion point for cricothyroidotomy using simple palpation and the laryngeal handshake method, respectively. The cricothyroid membrane was confirmed with ultrasonography. Identification was determined successful if the marked point was placed within the longitudinal area of the cricothyroid membrane and within 5 mm from midline transversely. The accuracy of cricothyroid membrane identification using the laryngeal handshake method and simple palpation was compared.
A total of 123 patients were enrolled. The cricothyroid membrane was correctly identified in 87 (70.7%, 95% confidence interval 61.8-78.6%) patients using the laryngeal handshake method compared to 78 (63.4%, 95% confidence interval 54.3-71.9%) patients using simple palpation (P = .188). The time required to identify the cricothyroid membrane was longer when using the laryngeal handshake method (15 [3-48] seconds vs 10.9 [3-55] seconds, P = .003).
The success rate of identifying the cricothyroid membrane was similar among the anesthesiologists who performed the laryngeal handshake method and also among otorhinolaryngologists who used simple palpation.
环状软骨膜是最常被用于进行有创性外科气道的位置。虽然推荐使用喉握手法来识别环状软骨膜,但目前尚无关于喉握手法在环状软骨膜识别中的效用的临床数据。本研究的目的是比较喉握手法和单纯触诊在环状软骨膜识别中的准确性。
在麻醉诱导后,耳鼻喉科住院医师和麻醉住院医师分别使用单纯触诊和喉握手法来识别并标记用于环甲膜切开术的针插入点。使用超声来确认环状软骨膜。如果标记点位于环状软骨膜的纵向区域内并且距中线横向 5mm 内,则认为识别成功。比较使用喉握手法和单纯触诊进行环状软骨膜识别的准确性。
共纳入 123 例患者。使用喉握手法正确识别环状软骨膜的患者有 87 例(70.7%,95%置信区间 61.8%-78.6%),而使用单纯触诊法的患者有 78 例(63.4%,95%置信区间 54.3%-71.9%)(P=.188)。使用喉握手法识别环状软骨膜所需的时间更长(15 [3-48] 秒 vs 10.9 [3-55] 秒,P=.003)。
执行喉握手法的麻醉医师和使用单纯触诊法的耳鼻喉科医师识别环状软骨膜的成功率相似。