Kim Kyung Woo, Lim Ho Chan, Park Jae Hee, Park Sang Gyu, Park Ye Jin, Cho Hm Hak
Safety and Health Policy Research Bureau, Occupational Safety and Health Research Institute, Korea Occupational Safety and Health Agency, Ulsan, Republic of Korea.
Department of Psychological Rehabilitation, Korea Nazarene University, Cheonan, Republic of Korea.
Saf Health Work. 2018 Jun;9(2):224-231. doi: 10.1016/j.shaw.2018.02.004. Epub 2018 Mar 17.
Organizations are pursing complex and diverse aims to generate higher profits. Many workers experience high work intensity such as workload and work pressure in this organizational environment. Especially, psychological burden is a commonly used term in workplace of Republic of Korea. This study focused on defining the psychological burden from the perspective of occupational safety and health and tried to develop a scale for psychological burden.
The 48 preliminary questionnaire items for psychological burden were prepared by a focus group interview with 16 workers through the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire II and Mindful Awareness Attention Scale. The preliminary items were surveyed with 572 workers, and exploratory factor analysis, confirmatory factor analysis, and correlation analysis were conducted for a new scale.
As a result of the exploratory factor analysis, five factors were extracted: organizational activity, human error, safety and health workload, work attitude, and negative self-management. These factors had significant correlations and reliability, and the stability of the model for validity was confirmed using confirmatory factor analysis.
The developed scale for psychological burden can measure workers' psychological burden in relation to safety and health. Despite some limitations, this study has applicability in the workplace, given the relatively small-sized questionnaire.
组织追求复杂多样的目标以获取更高利润。在这种组织环境中,许多员工承受着高强度的工作,如工作量和工作压力。特别是,心理负担是韩国职场常用的一个术语。本研究着重从职业安全与健康的角度界定心理负担,并试图开发一种心理负担量表。
通过哥本哈根心理社会问卷II和正念意识注意量表,对16名员工进行焦点小组访谈,编制了48项心理负担初步问卷项目。对572名员工进行了初步项目调查,并对新量表进行了探索性因素分析、验证性因素分析和相关性分析。
探索性因素分析结果提取出五个因素:组织活动、人为失误、安全与健康工作量、工作态度和消极自我管理。这些因素具有显著的相关性和可靠性,并通过验证性因素分析证实了模型有效性的稳定性。
所开发的心理负担量表能够测量员工与安全和健康相关的心理负担。尽管存在一些局限性,但鉴于问卷规模相对较小,本研究在工作场所具有适用性。