Liu S L, Na H Y, Li W H, Yun Q P, Jiang X W, Liu J N, Chang C
Department of Social Medicine and Health Education, Peking University School of Public Health, 100191.
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2018 Jun 18;50(3):474-481.
To provide autonomy support from three dimensions based on self-determination theory (SDT), i.e. professional support, peer support, family support, and to investigate whether this intervention can improve diabetes self-management behavior and glycemic control of diabetic patients, and to analyze the influencing factors of the effect.
Using convenient sampling method, three communities were selected respectively in Beijing. Each community selected health service stations with similar conditions as different intervention groups. The diabetic patients managed by the station who were eligible for inclusion were recruited into this intervention group. The community stations were divided into three groups. The routine intervention group only issued knowledge manuals and conducted health management according to the requirements of basic public health services. Peer support groups were divided into small groups and carried out doctor-led group activities. Based on doctor-led peer support activities, the doctors and peers were trained to provide autonomy support based on self-determination theory, and their family members were trained in the form of manuals to provide autonomy support, forming a concerted support of the three dimensions. Activity processes and materials were also designed based on SDT. The intervention duration was 3 months, and the main evaluation indexes were HbA1c and patients' self-management behaviors, skills, knowledge, and self-efficacy scores.
Before and after the intervention, the HbA1c of routine intervention group were 7.40%±1.37%, 7.30%±1.18%. The HbA1c of peer support group before and after the intervention were 7.33%±1.15% and 7.13%±1.27%. The HbA1c of autonomy support group before and after the intervention were 7.42%±1.22% and 6.78%±0.80%. Before and after the intervention, the self-management score in routine intervention group was 10.54±2.28 and 10.80±2.15, the score in peer support group was 11.09±1.89 and 11.40±1.78, the score in autonomy support group was 10.34±1.99 and 11.10±1.65, respectively. The HbA1c and self-management score increased higher in autonomy support group than in the other two groups. After intervention, the control rate in autonomy support group was higher than in the other two groups. According to the multi-factor analysis, the value of HbA1c after intervention was positively related to the baseline HbA1c, and negatively related to self-management behavior. The value in autonomy support group was higher than in routine intervention group. Baseline self-management behavior, self-efficacy, knowledge, skill, family support, autonomy support, peer support and age were positively correlated with the change of behavior.
self-management behavior intervention based on self-determination theory can effectively promote self-management behavior and glycemic control of diabetic patients, and the effect is better than single peer support activities.
基于自我决定理论(SDT)从专业支持、同伴支持、家庭支持三个维度提供自主支持,探讨该干预能否改善糖尿病患者的自我管理行为和血糖控制,并分析效果的影响因素。
采用便利抽样法,在北京分别选取三个社区。每个社区选取条件相似的卫生服务站作为不同干预组。将在该站管理的符合纳入条件的糖尿病患者招募到本干预组。社区卫生服务站分为三组。常规干预组仅发放知识手册并按基本公共卫生服务要求进行健康管理。同伴支持组分成小组开展医生主导的小组活动。在医生主导的同伴支持活动基础上,对医生和同伴进行培训以基于自我决定理论提供自主支持,对其家庭成员以手册形式培训提供自主支持,形成三个维度的协同支持。活动流程和材料也基于自我决定理论进行设计。干预时长为3个月,主要评价指标为糖化血红蛋白(HbA1c)以及患者的自我管理行为、技能、知识和自我效能得分。
干预前后,常规干预组的HbA1c分别为7.40%±1.37%、7.30%±1.18%。同伴支持组干预前后的HbA1c分别为7.33%±1.15%和7.13%±1.27%。自主支持组干预前后的HbA1c分别为7.42%±1.22%和6.78%±0.80%。干预前后,常规干预组的自我管理得分分别为10.54±2.28和10.80±2.15,同伴支持组的得分分别为11.09±1.89和11.40±1.78,自主支持组的得分分别为10.34±1.99和11.10±1.65。自主支持组的HbA1c和自我管理得分较其他两组升高更明显。干预后,自主支持组的控制率高于其他两组。多因素分析显示,干预后HbA1c值与基线HbA1c呈正相关,与自我管理行为呈负相关。自主支持组的值高于常规干预组。基线自我管理行为、自我效能、知识、技能、家庭支持、自主支持、同伴支持和年龄与行为变化呈正相关。
基于自我决定理论的自我管理行为干预能有效促进糖尿病患者的自我管理行为和血糖控制,且效果优于单纯的同伴支持活动。