Dua Anahita, Chandra Venita
1 Division of Vascular Surgery, Department of Surgery, Stanford Hospitals and Clinics, Palo Alto, CA, USA.
Vasc Endovascular Surg. 2018 Nov;52(8):593-595. doi: 10.1177/1538574418780055. Epub 2018 Jun 22.
Retrograde pedal access is a technique utilized with increasing frequency by many interventionists to address patients with advanced multilevel peripheral artery disease and significant comorbidities. This approach to revascularization is being used both in patients who fail traditional antegrade access and in some patients thought to be poor candidates for antegrade approach. However, the lack of randomized controlled trial data, or long-term results, coupled with the associated potential risks including dissection, spasm, and thrombosis have rendered retrograde pedal access a controversial topic. This article details the pros and cons associated with the debate surrounding retrograde pedal access and highlights the current literature and remaining questions regarding outcomes of this technique.
逆行足背入路是一种被越来越多的介入医生频繁使用的技术,用于治疗患有晚期多节段外周动脉疾病及严重合并症的患者。这种血管重建方法既用于传统顺行入路失败的患者,也用于一些被认为不适合顺行入路的患者。然而,由于缺乏随机对照试验数据或长期结果,再加上包括夹层、痉挛和血栓形成在内的相关潜在风险,逆行足背入路已成为一个有争议的话题。本文详细阐述了围绕逆行足背入路争论的利弊,并着重介绍了有关该技术结果的当前文献及尚存的问题。