Beyond the Gleason score: the prognostic significance of prostate cancer subtypes.
作者信息
Flood Trevor A, Schieda Nicola
机构信息
Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
Department of Medical Imaging, The Ottawa Hospital, Ottawa, Canada.
出版信息
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 May;7(Suppl 2):S260-S261. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.04.01.
Abstract
摘要
相似文献
1
Beyond the Gleason score: the prognostic significance of prostate cancer subtypes.超越Gleason评分：前列腺癌亚型的预后意义。
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 May;7(Suppl 2):S260-S261. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.04.01.
2
Prognostic significance of architectural subtypes of Gleason grade 4 prostate cancer in radical prostatectomy: A semiquantitative method of evaluation.根治性前列腺切除术中 Gleason 4 级前列腺癌结构亚型的预后意义：一种半定量评估方法。
Ann Diagn Pathol. 2021 Feb;50:151678. doi: 10.1016/j.anndiagpath.2020.151678. Epub 2020 Dec 13.
3
4
Prognostic value of the Gleason score in prostate cancer.Gleason评分在前列腺癌中的预后价值。
BJU Int. 2002 Apr;89(6):538-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-410x.2002.02669.x.
5
Persistent Homology for the Quantitative Evaluation of Architectural Features in Prostate Cancer Histology.持久同调在前列腺癌组织学中结构特征定量评估中的应用。
Sci Rep. 2019 Feb 4;9(1):1139. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-36798-y.
6
PSA failure following definitive treatment of prostate cancer having biopsy Gleason score 7 with tertiary grade 5.经活检 Gleason 评分为 7 级且三级为 5 级的前列腺癌根治性治疗后出现前列腺特异性抗原（PSA）失败。
JAMA. 2007 Oct 3;298(13):1533-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.298.13.1533.
7
Prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in Japanese men with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer treated with radical prostatectomy.对于接受根治性前列腺切除术治疗的 Gleason 评分 7 级前列腺癌的日本男性，原发 Gleason 模式的预后意义。
Urol Oncol. 2013 Nov;31(8):1511-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2012.05.001. Epub 2012 May 31.
8
Long-term prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: impact on prostate cancer specific survival.Gleason评分7分的前列腺癌患者中主要Gleason分级模式的长期预后意义：对前列腺癌特异性生存的影响
J Urol. 2006 Feb;175(2):547-51. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00152-7.
9
The prognostic significance of Gleason pattern 5 in prostate cancer patients treated with Pd-103 brachytherapy.
Am J Clin Oncol. 2007 Dec;30(6):597-600. doi: 10.1097/COC.0b013e318145b9ba.
10
The prognostic significance of Gleason scores in metastatic prostate cancer.Gleason评分在转移性前列腺癌中的预后意义。
Urol Oncol. 2014 Jul;32(5):707-13. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2014.01.004. Epub 2014 Mar 12.
引用本文的文献
1
Reinterpretation of prostate cancer pathology by Appl1, Sortilin and Syndecan-1 biomarkers.通过Appl1、Sortilin和Syndecan-1生物标志物对前列腺癌病理学进行重新诠释。
Sci Data. 2024 Aug 8;11(1):852. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03696-0.
本文引用的文献
1
Clinical significance of subtypes of Gleason pattern 4 prostate cancer.Gleason 4级前列腺癌各亚型的临床意义
Transl Androl Urol. 2018 Sep;7(Suppl 4):S477-S483. doi: 10.21037/tau.2018.02.06.
2
Evaluation of tumor morphologies and association with biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy in grade group 5 prostate cancer.5级前列腺癌根治性前列腺切除术后肿瘤形态学评估及其与生化复发的相关性
Virchows Arch. 2018 Feb;472(2):205-212. doi: 10.1007/s00428-017-2241-9. Epub 2017 Oct 3.
3
Utility of Gleason pattern 4 morphologies detected on transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided biopsies for prediction of upgrading or upstaging in Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer.经直肠超声（TRUS）引导下活检检测到的Gleason 4级形态在预测Gleason评分3 + 4 = 7的前列腺癌升级或分期升高方面的效用
Virchows Arch. 2016 Sep;469(3):313-9. doi: 10.1007/s00428-016-1981-2. Epub 2016 Jul 10.
4
The 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: Definition of Grading Patterns and Proposal for a New Grading System.2014年国际泌尿病理学会（ISUP）前列腺癌Gleason分级共识会议：分级模式的定义及新分级系统的建议
Am J Surg Pathol. 2016 Feb;40(2):244-52. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000530.
5
Cribriform morphology predicts upstaging after radical prostatectomy in patients with Gleason score 3 + 4 = 7 prostate cancer at transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided needle biopsy.在经直肠超声（TRUS）引导下穿刺活检 Gleason 评分 3 + 4 = 7 的前列腺癌患者中，筛状形态可预测根治性前列腺切除术后分期升级。
Virchows Arch. 2015 Oct;467(4):437-42. doi: 10.1007/s00428-015-1809-5. Epub 2015 Jul 31.
6
Architectural heterogeneity and cribriform pattern predict adverse clinical outcome for Gleason grade 4 prostatic adenocarcinoma.结构异质性和筛状模式可预测 Gleason 分级 4 前列腺腺癌的不良临床结局。
Am J Surg Pathol. 2013 Dec;37(12):1855-61. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0b013e3182a02169.
Zotero 插件