Ma Qixiang, Feng Yanyan, Deng Kaiwen, Shao Haozhen, Sui Tongtong, Zhang Xin, Sun Xiao, Jin Lin, Ma Zhitao, Luo Guangbin
School of Life Sciences, Centre For Translational Oncology, Beijing University of Chinese Medicine, 11 Beisanhuandong Road, Chaoyang District, Beijing 100029, People's Republic of China.
Department of Genetics and Genome Sciences, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
J Cancer. 2018 May 25;9(12):2183-2190. doi: 10.7150/jca.25454. eCollection 2018.
The present study aimed to investigate whether cell lines from human gastric and liver cancers respond differently toward cantharidin (CTD) and norcantharidin (NCTD) than other types of cancer cells. We first established the half maximal inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) of CTD for a large panel of cancer cell lines representing the 12 major types of human cancers and the mode of cell death induced by the two compounds. We next compared the growth inhibitory effects as well as the corresponding modes of action of CTD and NCTD. The IncuCyte ZOOM system was used as a semi-high throughput means to define IC50s and 90% inhibitory doses (IC90s) as a reference for the maximal tolerable doses (MTDs) for the two compounds in 72 cancer cell lines. Classical clonogenic survival assay was used to assess the anti-proliferative effect of CTD on selected cell lines of interest. In addition, DNA content-based flow was used to interrogate the modes of cell death following CTD or NCTD exposure. The results of these experiments led to several findings. 1). Cell lines representing hepatocellular carcinomas (HCCs) and cholangiocarcinomas (CCs) were among the most sensitive toward CTD, consistent with the previous clinical study of this compound and its source of origin, . 2). Among the individual cell lines of a given cancer types, the sensitivity trends for CTD and NCTD did not exhibit a good correlation. 3) CTD and NCTD caused distinctive cytotoxic effects on HepG2 cells. Specifically, while a cytostatic effect is the primary cause of growth inhibition of CTD, cytotoxic effect is the main contributing factor for the growth inhibition of NTCD. These results indicate that liver cancer cell lines are among the most sensitive to CTD and that CTD and NCTD exhibit their effects through distinct mechanisms.
本研究旨在调查人胃癌和肝癌的细胞系对斑蝥素(CTD)和去甲斑蝥素(NCTD)的反应是否与其他类型的癌细胞不同。我们首先确定了CTD对一大组代表人类12种主要癌症类型的癌细胞系的半数最大抑制浓度(IC50)以及这两种化合物诱导的细胞死亡模式。接下来,我们比较了CTD和NCTD的生长抑制作用以及相应的作用方式。使用IncuCyte ZOOM系统作为半高通量手段来确定IC50和90%抑制剂量(IC90),作为这两种化合物在72种癌细胞系中的最大耐受剂量(MTD)的参考。经典的克隆形成存活试验用于评估CTD对选定的感兴趣细胞系的抗增殖作用。此外,基于DNA含量的流式细胞术用于探究CTD或NCTD处理后细胞的死亡模式。这些实验结果得出了几个发现。1). 代表肝细胞癌(HCC)和胆管癌(CC)的细胞系对CTD最为敏感,这与该化合物及其来源的先前临床研究一致。2). 在给定癌症类型的各个细胞系中,CTD和NCTD的敏感性趋势没有表现出良好的相关性。3). CTD和NCTD对HepG2细胞产生了独特的细胞毒性作用。具体而言,虽然细胞周期抑制作用是CTD生长抑制的主要原因,但细胞毒性作用是NTCD生长抑制的主要促成因素。这些结果表明,肝癌细胞系对CTD最为敏感,并且CTD和NCTD通过不同的机制发挥作用。