Hassannejad Zahra, Zadegan Shayan Abdollah, Shakouri-Motlagh Aida, Mokhatab Mona, Rezvan Motahareh, Sharif-Alhoseini Mahdi, Shokraneh Farhad, Moshayedi Pouria, Rahimi-Movaghar Vafa
Pediatric Urology and Regenerative Medicine Research Center, Children's Hospital Medical Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Sina Trauma and Surgery Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Iran J Basic Med Sci. 2018 Jun;21(6):546-557. doi: 10.22038/IJBMS.2018.24239.6052.
To reach an evidence-based knowledge in the context of the temporal-spatial pattern of neuronal death and find appropriate time of intervention in order to preserve spared neurons and promote regeneration after traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI).
The study design was based on Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA)-guided systematic review. PubMed and EMBASE were searched (24 October, 2015) with no temporal or linguistic restrictions. Hand-search was performed in the bibliographies of relevant articles. Non-interventional animal studies evaluating time-dependent neuronal death following acute mechanical trauma to the spinal cord were included. We separately evaluated the fate of various populations of neurons including propriospinal neurons, ventral motor neurons, Clarke's column neurons, and supraspinal neurons.
We found 11,557 non-duplicated studies. Screening through the titles and abstracts led to 549 articles, 49 of which met the inclusion criteria. Both necrotic and apoptotic neuronal deaths occur after TSCI, though necrosis is the prominent mechanism. There are differences in the responses of intrinsic neurons of the spinal cord to the TSCI. Also, the extent of neuronal death in the supraspinal neurons depends on the anatomical location of their axons.
In order to develop new therapies, selection of the injury model and time of intervention has a crucial role in the efficacy of therapy. In addition, examining the safety and efficacy of an intervention by reliable methods not confounded by the injury-related changes would promote translation of therapies to the clinical application.
了解创伤性脊髓损伤(TSCI)后神经元死亡的时空模式,获取基于证据的知识,并找到合适的干预时机,以保护存活的神经元并促进损伤后再生。
本研究设计基于系统评价和Meta分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)指导的系统评价。检索了PubMed和EMBASE(2015年10月24日),无时间或语言限制。对相关文章的参考文献进行了手工检索。纳入评估急性机械性脊髓损伤后时间依赖性神经元死亡的非干预性动物研究。我们分别评估了不同类型神经元的命运,包括脊髓固有神经元、腹侧运动神经元、克拉克柱神经元和脊髓上神经元。
我们共找到11557项非重复研究。通过标题和摘要筛选后得到549篇文章,其中49篇符合纳入标准。TSCI后坏死性和凋亡性神经元死亡均会发生,不过坏死是主要机制。脊髓内源性神经元对TSCI的反应存在差异。此外,脊髓上神经元的死亡程度取决于其轴突的解剖位置。
为开发新的治疗方法,损伤模型的选择和干预时机对治疗效果起着关键作用。此外,通过可靠方法检查干预措施的安全性和有效性,且不受损伤相关变化的干扰,将有助于促进治疗方法向临床应用的转化。