Suppr超能文献

利伐沙班和阿哌沙班在静脉血栓栓塞患者中的安全性和有效性:一项全国性研究。

Safety and effectiveness of rivaroxaban and apixaban in patients with venous thromboembolism: a nationwide study.

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Copenhagen University Hospital Herlev and Gentofte, Kildegaardsvej 28, Hellerup, Denmark.

Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Blegdamsvej 3B, Copenhagen N, Denmark.

出版信息

Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Pharmacother. 2018 Oct 1;4(4):220-227. doi: 10.1093/ehjcvp/pvy021.

Abstract

AIMS

To investigate the risk of all-cause mortality, recurrent venous thromboembolism (VTE), and hospitalized bleeding in patients with VTE treated with either rivaroxaban or apixaban.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Using Danish nationwide registries, patients with VTE treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban in the period from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2017 were identified. Standardized absolute risks were estimated based on outcome-specific Cox regression models, adjusted for potential confounders. A total of 8187 patients were included in the study, of which 1504 (18%) were treated with apixaban [50% males, median age 70 years; interquartile range (IQR) 56-80] and 6683 (82%) were treated with rivaroxaban (55% males, median age 67 years; IQR 53-76). The 180 days risk of all-cause mortality was 5.08% [95% confidence interval (95% CI) 4.08% to 6.08%)] in the apixaban group and 4.60% (95% CI 4.13% to 5.18%) in the rivaroxaban group [absolute risk difference: -0.48% (95% CI -1.49% to 0.72%)]. The 180 days risk of recurrent VTE was 2.16% (95% CI 1.49% to 2.88%) in the apixaban group and 2.22% (95% CI 1.89% to 2.52%) in the rivaroxaban group [absolute risk difference of 0.06% (95% CI -0.72% to 0.79%)]. The 180 days risk of hospitalized bleeding was 1.73% (95% CI 1.22% to 2.35%) for patients in the apixaban group and 1.89% (95% CI 1.56% to 2.20%) in the rivaroxaban group [absolute risk difference: 0.16% (95% CI -0.59% to 0.81%)].

CONCLUSION

In a nationwide cohort of 8187 patients with VTE treated with rivaroxaban or apixaban, there were no significant differences in the risks of all-cause mortality, recurrent VTE, or hospitalized bleeding.

摘要

目的

研究使用利伐沙班或阿哌沙班治疗的静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)患者的全因死亡率、复发性静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)和住院出血风险。

方法和结果

利用丹麦全国性登记处,确定了 2015 年 1 月 1 日至 2017 年 6 月 30 日期间接受利伐沙班或阿哌沙班治疗的 VTE 患者。基于结局特异性 Cox 回归模型,对标准化绝对风险进行估计,同时调整了潜在混杂因素。共纳入 8187 例患者,其中 1504 例(18%)接受阿哌沙班治疗[50%为男性,中位年龄 70 岁;四分位距(IQR)56-80],6683 例(82%)接受利伐沙班治疗(55%为男性,中位年龄 67 岁;IQR 53-76)。阿哌沙班组 180 天全因死亡率风险为 5.08%(95%可信区间[95%CI]:4.08%-6.08%),利伐沙班组为 4.60%(95%CI:4.13%-5.18%)[绝对风险差:-0.48%(95%CI:-1.49%-0.72%)]。阿哌沙班组 180 天复发性 VTE 风险为 2.16%(95%CI:1.49%-2.88%),利伐沙班组为 2.22%(95%CI:1.89%-2.52%)[绝对风险差为 0.06%(95%CI:-0.72%-0.79%)]。阿哌沙班组 180 天住院出血风险为 1.73%(95%CI:1.22%-2.35%),利伐沙班组为 1.89%(95%CI:1.56%-2.20%)[绝对风险差:0.16%(95%CI:-0.59%-0.81%)]。

结论

在一项纳入 8187 例接受利伐沙班或阿哌沙班治疗的 VTE 患者的全国性队列中,全因死亡率、复发性 VTE 或住院出血风险无显著差异。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验