Difazio Rachel L, Strout Tania D, Vessey Judith A, Lulloff Amanda
Rachel L. Difazio, PhD, RN, PPCNP-BC, FAAN, is Nurse Scientist, Orthopedic Center, Boston Children's Hospital, and Instructor, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts. Tania D. Strout, PhD, RN, MS, is Director of Research and Associate Professor, Department of Emergency Medicine, Maine Medical Center, Tufts University School of Medicine, Portland. Judith A. Vessey, PhD, MBA, RN, FAAN, is Lelia Holden Carroll Professor in Nursing, William F. Connell School of Nursing, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts, and Nurse Scientist, Medicine Patient Services, Boston Children's Hospital, Massachusetts. Amanda Lulloff, MSN, RN, PCNS, CPHON, is Nurse Educator, Dana-Farber Jimmy Fund Clinic, Boston, Massachusetts.
Nurs Res. 2018 Jul/Aug;67(4):294-304. doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000283.
Healthcare providers do not uniformly screen young patients for exposure to bullying, and no screening instruments have been developed for widespread use in clinical settings.
The objectives of this study were to (a) generate scale items by identifying and eliciting concepts relevant to youths with potential exposure to bullying as well as to professionals who work with bullied youths and (b) assess the content validity of the new Child-Adolescent Bullying Scale (CABS) instrument.
A mixed-methods design was used to develop an initial pool of 52 items. The study was conducted in four phases: (I) comprehensive review of the existing literature; (II) concept elicitation through the conduct of focus groups with school-age youths and professionals who work with bullied youths; (III) concept selection and item construction; and (IV) content validation assessment of relevance, clarity, and dimension of each item by a panel of 30 international bullying and measurement experts through completion of an online survey.
An initial pool of 52 potential items was developed during Phases I-III of the study. During Phase IV, item- and scale-level content validity indices were calculated and were used to refine the item pool. These strategies resulted in a new, 22-item tool, with scale-level content validity indices of .954 for clarity and .920 for representativeness.
Evaluation of the CABS tool with a sample of youths drawn from healthcare settings will be necessary to assess the performance of the CABS items, further evaluate its psychometric properties, and further refine the tool.
医疗服务提供者对年轻患者遭受欺凌的筛查并不统一,且尚未开发出可在临床环境中广泛使用的筛查工具。
本研究的目的是:(a)通过识别和引出与可能遭受欺凌的青少年以及与受欺凌青少年打交道的专业人员相关的概念来生成量表项目;(b)评估新的儿童青少年欺凌量表(CABS)工具的内容效度。
采用混合方法设计来开发一个包含52个条目的初始库。该研究分四个阶段进行:(I)对现有文献进行全面综述;(II)通过与学龄青少年以及与受欺凌青少年打交道的专业人员进行焦点小组讨论来引出概念;(III)概念选择和条目构建;(IV)由30名国际欺凌和测量专家组成的小组通过完成在线调查,对每个条目的相关性、清晰度和维度进行内容效度评估。
在研究的第一至三阶段开发了一个包含52个潜在条目的初始库。在第四阶段,计算了条目和量表层面的内容效度指数,并用于完善条目库。这些策略产生了一个新的、包含22个条目的工具,量表层面的内容效度指数在清晰度方面为0.954,代表性方面为0.920。
有必要对从医疗环境中抽取的青少年样本使用CABS工具进行评估,以评估CABS条目的性能,进一步评估其心理测量特性,并进一步完善该工具。