The University of Utah, Department of Sociology, 380 S 1530 E #301, Salt Lake City, UT 84112.
University of Utah, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 30 North 1900 East, Room 2B200, Salt Lake City, UT 84132-2209.
Contraception. 2018 Oct;98(4):270-274. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2018.06.007. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
To estimate the prevalence of sexual-minority women among clients in family planning centers and explore differences in LARC uptake by both sexual identity (i.e., exclusively heterosexual, mostly heterosexual, bisexual, lesbian) and sexual behavior in the past 12 months (i.e., only male partners, both male and female partners, only female partners, no partners) among those enrolled in the survey arm of the HER Salt Lake Contraceptive Initiative.
This survey categorized participants into groups based on reports of sexual identity and sexual behavior. We report contraceptive uptake by these factors, and we used logistic and multinomial logistic models to assess differences in contraceptive method selection by sexual identity and behavior.
Among 3901 survey respondents, 32% (n=1230) identified with a sexual-minority identity and 6% had had a female partner in the past 12 months. By identity, bisexual and mostly heterosexual women selected an IUD or implant more frequently than exclusively heterosexual women and demonstrated a preference for the copper T380 IUD. Exclusively heterosexual and lesbian women did not differ in their contraceptive method selection, however, by behavior, women with only female partners selected IUDs or implants less frequently than those with only male partners.
One in three women attending family planning centers for contraception identified as a sexual minority. Sexual-minority women selected IUDs or implants more frequently than exclusively heterosexual women.
Providers should avoid care assumptions based upon sexual identity. Sexual-minority women should be offered all methods of contraception and be provided with inclusive contraceptive counseling conversations.
评估计划生育中心客户中少数性取向女性的比例,并探讨在过去 12 个月内(即仅有男性伴侣、既有男性又有女性伴侣、仅有女性伴侣、无伴侣)的性行为基础上,按性身份(即完全异性恋、主要异性恋、双性恋、同性恋)和性取向(即完全异性恋、主要异性恋、双性恋、同性恋)划分的参与者中,长效可逆避孕(LARC)的使用率差异。
本调查根据性身份和性行为报告将参与者分为不同组别。我们报告了这些因素对避孕措施的影响,并使用逻辑和多项逻辑回归模型评估了性身份和行为对避孕方法选择的差异。
在 3901 名调查受访者中,32%(n=1230)认同少数性取向身份,6%在过去 12 个月内有女性伴侣。从身份上看,双性恋和主要异性恋女性比完全异性恋女性更常选择宫内节育器或植入物,并更倾向于选择铜 T380 宫内节育器。然而,完全异性恋和同性恋女性在避孕方法选择上没有差异,但从行为上看,仅有女性伴侣的女性选择宫内节育器或植入物的频率低于仅有男性伴侣的女性。
在接受计划生育服务以避孕的女性中,有三分之一的女性认同为少数性取向。少数性取向女性比完全异性恋女性更常选择宫内节育器或植入物。
提供者应避免基于性身份的护理假设。应向少数性取向女性提供所有避孕方法,并为其提供包容的避孕咨询对话。