Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers' Training and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Institute of Technical Teachers' Training and Research, Chandigarh, India.
Biosens Bioelectron. 2018 Oct 15;117:403-415. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2018.06.027. Epub 2018 Jun 29.
Though many rehabilitative treatments are available for treatment of spasticity, thus the effectiveness of different robo-rehabilitative devices needs to be evaluated through a systematic review.
The objective of this study is to focuses on the efficacy of Robot assistive rehabilitation device for the removal of spasticity from the lower limb of Spastic patients.
PubMed, Web of Sciences, EMBASE (Excerpta Medical database), CDSR (Cochrane database of systematic reviews), Scopus, IEEE Xplore, Wiley online library, MEDLINE (OvidSP), Science Direct, Springer Link were from January 1980 to September 2017 DATA EXTRACTIONEXTRACTION: Seventy-one publications from eleven databases published were selected using keywords Ankle foot, spasticity, robotic rehabilitation, efficacy of robotics and Ankle foot rehabilitation. The review is narrowed down to twenty-six articles which were selected for they focused on effects of Robot assistive rehabilitation device quantitatively.
A quantitative study from analyzing 26 studies comprising of 786 subjects is carried out. The major outcome of the effectiveness of the robot assistive therapy for the movement of ankle and functioning of gait is deduced. As the used protocols and treatment procedures vary, made comparative study complex or impracticable.
Robo-rehabilitation possesses an ability to provide unified therapy protocols with greater ease in comparison to conventional therapies. They continuously prove to be irreplaceable assistant devices when it comes to providing excellent treatment in terms of improvement from this study. Though many mechatronic devices are available but the devices for treatment of early stage rehabilitation of stroke patients is very limited.
虽然有许多康复治疗方法可用于治疗痉挛,但需要通过系统评价来评估不同的机器人康复设备的有效性。
本研究的目的是关注机器人辅助康复设备对痉挛患者下肢痉挛的去除效果。
从 1980 年 1 月至 2017 年 9 月,使用关键词“踝关节足,痉挛,机器人康复,机器人的疗效和踝关节足康复”,从 11 个数据库中选择了 71 篇出版物。该综述缩小到 26 篇文章,这些文章主要集中在机器人辅助康复设备的定量效果上。
对 26 项研究(共 786 名受试者)进行了定量研究。得出了机器人辅助治疗对踝关节运动和步态功能的有效性的主要结果。由于使用的方案和治疗程序不同,使得比较研究变得复杂或不切实际。
与传统疗法相比,机器人康复具有提供统一治疗方案的能力,更为便捷。在提供卓越治疗方面,它们不断被证明是不可替代的辅助设备,在改善方面,本研究结果就是证明。虽然有许多机电一体化设备,但用于治疗中风患者早期康复的设备非常有限。