Jin Jian-Rong, Li Tian, Wang Sheng-Si, Chen Zi-Juan, Zhou Jia-Wen
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China.
Huan Jing Ke Xue. 2017 Sep 8;38(9):3689-3695. doi: 10.13227/j.hjkx.201702110.
In order to evaluate the hydrological performance of permeable pavements in mitigating the surface runoff, four pilot-scale permeable pavement units were constructed in Shanghai and compared with impervious pavements. Three of the permeable facilities with waterproof liners included a pervious concrete pavement (facility Ⅰ), permeable interlocking concrete pavement using cement stabilized macadam as the base course (facility Ⅱ) and permeable interlocking concrete pavement using macadam as the base course (facility Ⅲ). The other two facilities were a conventional permeable interlocking concrete pavement without a liner (facility Ⅳ) and an impervious concrete pavement control (facility 0). V-notch flow meters, data loggers, and a rainfall meter were mounted to monitor the hydrological data. A double-ring infiltrometer was applied to evaluate the infiltration rate of the pavements. During the one-year experiment, the surface runoff and the underdrain discharge flow rate of the four pilot-scale facilities were continuously monitored in actual rainfall and the total volume reduction, peak flow reduction, and peak concentrating time of different facilities were investigated. The results showed that the surface steady infiltration rates of permeable interlocking concrete pavements were less than those of the pervious concrete, and the surface steady infiltration rates of the two types of surface layers decreased after one year of usage. The surface runoff reduction of the four facilities showed no significant differences. The water volume reduction rate of the three types of facilities was weak. The annual total volume reduction rates were 24.2%, 28.5%, and 28.4%, and the controlled rainfall amounts were 5.2 mm, 7.8 mm, and 7.8 mm. The peak flow reduction rate and the time to the peak flow of facility Ⅰ were smaller than those of facility Ⅱ and facility Ⅲ. The peak flow reduction rate and the time to the peak flow of the three facilities showed significant negative correlation with rainfall intensity.
为了评估透水路面在缓解地表径流方面的水文性能,在上海建造了四个中试规模的透水路面单元,并与不透水路面进行比较。三个带有防水衬里的透水设施包括透水混凝土路面(设施Ⅰ)、以水泥稳定碎石为基层的透水联锁混凝土路面(设施Ⅱ)和以碎石为基层的透水联锁混凝土路面(设施Ⅲ)。另外两个设施是无衬里的传统透水联锁混凝土路面(设施Ⅳ)和不透水混凝土路面对照(设施0)。安装了V型缺口流量计、数据记录器和雨量计来监测水文数据。使用双环渗透仪评估路面的渗透率。在为期一年的实验中,在实际降雨期间持续监测了四个中试规模设施的地表径流和排水流量,并研究了不同设施的总体积减少量、峰值流量减少量和峰值集中时间。结果表明,透水联锁混凝土路面的表面稳定渗透率低于透水混凝土路面,且两种面层的表面稳定渗透率在使用一年后有所下降。四个设施的地表径流减少量没有显著差异。三种设施的水量减少率较低。年总体积减少率分别为24.2%、28.5%和28.4%,控制降雨量分别为5.2毫米、7.8毫米和7.8毫米。设施Ⅰ的峰值流量减少率和峰值流量出现时间小于设施Ⅱ和设施Ⅲ。三种设施的峰值流量减少率和峰值流量出现时间与降雨强度呈显著负相关。