Sampaio Rogerio Ferreira, Gomes Isabel Cristina, Sternick Eduardo Back
Faculdade Ciências Médicas de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, MG - Brazil.
Arq Bras Cardiol. 2018 Aug;111(2):122-131. doi: 10.5935/abc.20180112. Epub 2018 Jul 2.
Long-term monitoring has been advocated to enhance the detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients with stroke.
To evaluate the performance of a new ambulatory monitoring system with mobile data transmission (PoIP) compared with 24-hour Holter. We also aimed to evaluate the incidence of arrhythmias in patients with and without stroke or transient ischemic attack.
Consecutive patients with and without stroke or TIA, without AF, were matched by propensity score. Participants underwent 24-hour Holter and 7-day PoIP monitoring.
We selected 52 of 84 patients (26 with stroke or TIA and 26 controls). Connection and recording times were 156.5 ± 22.5 and 148.8 ± 20.8 hours, with a signal loss of 6,8% and 11,4%, respectively. Connection time was longer in ambulatory (164.3 ± 15.8 h) than in hospitalized patients (148.8 ± 25.6 h) (p = 0.02), while recording time did not differ between them (153.7 ± 16.9 and 143.0 ± 23.3 h). AF episodes were detected in 1 patient with stroke by Holter, and in 7 individuals (1 control and 6 strokes) by PoIP. There was no difference in the incidence of arrhythmias between the groups.
Holter and PoIP performed equally well in the first 24 hours. Data transmission loss (4.5%) occurred by a mismatch between signal transmission (2.5G) and signal reception (3G) protocols in cell phone towers (3G). The incidence of arrhythmias was not different between stroke/TIA and control groups.
长期监测已被提倡用于提高中风患者心房颤动(AF)的检出率。
评估一种新型的具有移动数据传输功能(PoIP)的动态监测系统与24小时动态心电图监测(Holter)相比的性能。我们还旨在评估有无中风或短暂性脑缺血发作患者的心律失常发生率。
通过倾向评分匹配有或无中风或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)且无房颤的连续患者。参与者接受24小时动态心电图监测和7天的PoIP监测。
我们从84例患者中选择了52例(26例有中风或TIA,26例为对照)。连接时间和记录时间分别为156.5±22.5小时和148.8±20.8小时,信号丢失率分别为6.8%和11.4%。动态监测时的连接时间(164.3±15.8小时)比住院患者(148.8±25.6小时)长(p=0.02),而记录时间在两者之间无差异(153.7±16.9小时和143.0±23.3小时)。动态心电图监测在1例中风患者中检测到房颤发作,PoIP在7例个体(1例对照和6例中风患者)中检测到房颤发作。两组间心律失常的发生率无差异。
动态心电图监测和PoIP在前24小时的表现同样良好。数据传输丢失(4.5%)是由于手机信号塔(3G)中信号传输(2.5G)与信号接收(3G)协议不匹配所致。中风/短暂性脑缺血发作组和对照组之间心律失常的发生率无差异。