Strobach Tilo, Hendrich Elisabeth, Kübler Sebastian, Müller Hermann, Schubert Torsten
Department Psychology, Medical School Hamburg, Am Kaiserkai 1, 20457, Hamburg, Germany.
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität Munich, Munich, Germany.
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2018 Oct;80(7):1785-1803. doi: 10.3758/s13414-018-1541-8.
When two overlapping tasks are processed, they hit a bottleneck at a central processing stage that prevents simultaneous processing of the two tasks. Thus far, however, the factors determining the processing order of the tasks at the bottleneck are unknown. The present study was designed to (re)investigate whether the arrival times of the two tasks at the central bottleneck are a key determinant of the processing order (cf. Sigman & Dehaene, 2006). To this end, we implemented a visual-auditory dual task with a random stimulus order, in which we manipulated arrival time by prolonging the initial, perceptual processing stage (stimulus analysis) of the visual task and compared the effects of this manipulation with those of one impacting the central bottleneck stage of the visual task. Additionally, we implemented two instruction conditions: Participants were told to respond either in the order of stimulus presentation or in the order they preferred. The manipulation of the visual perception stage led to an increase in task response reversals (i.e., the response order was different from the order of stimulus presentation), whereas there was no such increase when the bottleneck stage was manipulated. This pattern provides conclusive evidence that the processing order at the bottleneck is (at least in part) determined by the arrival times of the tasks at that point. Reaction time differences between the two instruction conditions indicated that additional control processes are engaged in determining task processing order when the participants are expressly told to respond in the order of stimulus presentation.
当处理两项重叠任务时,它们在一个中央处理阶段会遇到瓶颈,这会阻止两项任务的同时处理。然而,到目前为止,决定瓶颈处任务处理顺序的因素尚不清楚。本研究旨在(重新)调查两项任务到达中央瓶颈的时间是否是处理顺序的关键决定因素(参见西格曼和德阿纳,2006年)。为此,我们实施了一项具有随机刺激顺序的视觉-听觉双重任务,其中我们通过延长视觉任务的初始感知处理阶段(刺激分析)来操纵到达时间,并将这种操纵的效果与影响视觉任务中央瓶颈阶段的操纵效果进行比较。此外,我们实施了两种指导条件:告知参与者要么按照刺激呈现的顺序做出反应,要么按照他们喜欢的顺序做出反应。对视觉感知阶段的操纵导致任务反应逆转增加(即反应顺序与刺激呈现顺序不同),而在操纵瓶颈阶段时则没有这种增加。这种模式提供了确凿的证据,表明瓶颈处的处理顺序(至少部分)由任务在该点的到达时间决定。两种指导条件之间的反应时间差异表明,当明确告知参与者按照刺激呈现的顺序做出反应时,额外的控制过程会参与确定任务处理顺序。