Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Norwegian Centre for Mental Disorders Research, K.G. Jebsen Centre for Psychosis Research, Division of Mental Health and Addiction, Oslo University Hospital and Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
Clinical Neuroscience Research Group, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway; Division of Psychiatry, Diakonhjemmet Hospital, Oslo, Norway.
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2019 Jan;4(1):16-26. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2018.05.005. Epub 2018 May 30.
Depression is a complex disorder with large interindividual variability in symptom profiles that often occur alongside symptoms of other psychiatric domains, such as anxiety. A dimensional and symptom-based approach may help refine the characterization of depressive and anxiety disorders and thus aid in establishing robust biomarkers. We use resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging to assess the brain functional connectivity correlates of a symptom-based clustering of individuals.
We assessed symptoms using the Beck Depression and Beck Anxiety Inventories in individuals with or without a history of depression (N = 1084) and high-dimensional data clustering to form subgroups based on symptom profiles. We compared dynamic and static functional connectivity between subgroups in a subset of the total sample (n = 252).
We identified five subgroups with distinct symptom profiles, which cut across diagnostic boundaries with different total severity, symptom patterns, and centrality. For instance, inability to relax, fear of the worst, and feelings of guilt were among the most severe symptoms in subgroups 1, 2, and 3, respectively. The distribution of individuals was 32%, 25%, 22%, 10%, and 11% in subgroups 1 to 5, respectively. These subgroups showed evidence of differential static brain-connectivity patterns, in particular comprising a frontotemporal network. In contrast, we found no significant associations with clinical sum scores, dynamic functional connectivity, or global connectivity.
Adding to the pursuit of individual-based treatment, subtyping based on a dimensional conceptualization and unique constellations of anxiety and depression symptoms is supported by distinct patterns of static functional connectivity in the brain.
抑郁症是一种复杂的障碍,其症状表现存在很大的个体间差异,且常与焦虑等其他精神领域的症状同时出现。采用维度和症状为基础的方法可能有助于完善抑郁和焦虑障碍的特征描述,从而有助于建立稳健的生物标志物。我们使用静息态功能磁共振成像来评估基于症状聚类的个体的大脑功能连接相关性。
我们使用贝克抑郁和贝克焦虑量表评估了有或没有抑郁病史的个体(N=1084)的症状,并使用高维数据聚类根据症状谱形成亚组。我们在总样本的一部分(n=252)中比较了亚组之间的动态和静态功能连接。
我们确定了五个具有不同症状谱的亚组,这些亚组跨越了诊断边界,具有不同的总体严重程度、症状模式和中心性。例如,无法放松、担心最坏情况和内疚感是亚组 1、2 和 3 中最严重的症状之一。个体的分布分别为亚组 1 至 5 的 32%、25%、22%、10%和 11%。这些亚组显示出静态脑连接模式存在差异的证据,特别是包含额颞网络。相比之下,我们没有发现与临床总和评分、动态功能连接或全局连接有显著关联。
在追求个体化治疗的基础上,基于焦虑和抑郁症状的维度概念化和独特组合的亚分类得到了大脑静息态功能连接的不同模式的支持。