Is there a need for standardized postoperative radiographs after operative treatment of wrist or ankle fractures?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the frequency of changes in treatment plan due to standardized postoperative radiographs. A secondary aim was to compare our results with a national benchmark.

METHODS

This is a single-center retrospective case series of 167 consecutive patients, operated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) for distal radius or ankle fractures in 2014. Changes in the treatment protocol were defined as additional CT-imaging, reoperation or other changes as stated in the postoperative instructions. In addition, a national survey was conducted assessing differences between surgeons in different hospitals concerning revision rates.

RESULTS

In 7.2% (12/167) of the patients, a change in the treatment plan was recorded after the standardized postoperative radiographs. 10 patients (6%) were reoperated (three without additional imaging, seven after additional imaging with CT). The results from our survey showed a good assessment concerning the quality of intraoperative imaging (7.85 on a scale from 0 to 10). Concerning the revision rate, there was a trend to lower revision rate of 8.1% in the six observers.

CONCLUSIONS

Standard postoperative radiographs could improve quality of care. Intraoperative standardized radiographic documentation is needed and the perception and acceptance of quality may vary between hospitals.