Suppr超能文献

前瞻性评估脑损伤后生活质量(QOLIBRI)评分:在一年随访时,重度颅脑损伤患者与无或轻度颅脑损伤患者之间存在较小差异。

Prospective evaluation of the Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) score: minor differences in patients with major versus no or mild traumatic brain injury at one-year follow up.

机构信息

Department of Traumatology, Cantonal Hospital Aarau, Tellstrasse, CH-5001, Aarau, Switzerland.

, Basel, Switzerland.

出版信息

Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Jul 9;16(1):136. doi: 10.1186/s12955-018-0966-z.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) score was developed to assess disease-specific health-related quality of life (HRQoL) after traumatic brain injury (TBI). So far, validation studies on the QOLIBRI were only conducted in cohorts with traumatic brain injury. This study investigated the longer-term residuals in severely injured patients, focusing specifically on the possible impact of major TBI.

METHODS

In a prospective questionnaire investigation, 199 survivors with an injury severity score (ISS) > 15 participated in one-year follow-up. Patients who had sustained major TBI (abbreviated injury scale, AIS head > 2) were compared with patients who had no or only mild TBI (AIS head ≤ 2). Univariate analysis (ANOVA, Cohen's kappa, Pearson's r) and stepwise linear regression analysis (B with 95% CI, R, R) were used.

RESULTS

The total QOLIBRI revealed no differences in one-year outcomes between patients with versus without major TBI (75 and 76, resp.; p = 0.68). With regard to the cognitive subscore, the group with major TBI demonstrated significantly more limitations than the one with no or mild TBI (p < 0.05). The AIS head correlated significantly with the cognitive dimension of the QOLIBRI (r = - 0.16; p < 0.05), but not with the mental components of the SF-36 or the TOP. In multivariate analysis, the influence of the severity of head injury (AIS head) on total QOLIBRI was weaker than that of injured extremities (R = 0.02; p < 0.05 vs. R = 0.04; p = 0.001) and equal to the QOLIBRI cognitive subscore (R = 0.03, p < 0.01 each).

CONCLUSIONS

Given the unexpected result of similar mean QOLIBRI total score values and only minor differences in cognitive deficits following major trauma independently of whether patients sustained major brain injury or not, further studies should investigate whether the QOLIBRI actually has the discriminative capacity to detect specific residuals of major TBI. In effect, the score appears to indicate mental deficits following different types of severe trauma, which should be evaluated in more detail.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

NCT02165137 ; retrospectively registered 11 June 2014.

摘要

背景

《脑损伤后生活质量(QOLIBRI)评分》是为评估创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后的特定疾病相关健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)而开发的。迄今为止,对 QOLIBRI 的验证研究仅在创伤性脑损伤队列中进行。本研究调查了严重损伤患者的长期残留问题,特别关注严重 TBI 的可能影响。

方法

在一项前瞻性问卷调查研究中,199 名损伤严重程度评分(ISS)>15 的幸存者参加了为期一年的随访。将有严重 TBI(简明损伤量表,AIS 头>2)的患者与无脑或轻度 TBI(AIS 头≤2)的患者进行比较。使用单变量分析(ANOVA、Cohen's kappa、Pearson's r)和逐步线性回归分析(B 与 95%置信区间、R、R)。

结果

在一年的结果中,有和没有严重 TBI 的患者的总 QOLIBRI 没有差异(分别为 75 和 76,p=0.68)。在认知子评分方面,严重 TBI 组的限制明显多于无脑或轻度 TBI 组(p<0.05)。AIS 头与 QOLIBRI 的认知维度显著相关(r=-0.16;p<0.05),但与 SF-36 的心理成分或 TOP 无关。在多变量分析中,头部损伤严重程度(AIS 头)对总 QOLIBRI 的影响弱于受伤肢体(R=0.02;p<0.05 与 R=0.04;p=0.001),与 QOLIBRI 认知子评分相当(R=0.03,p<0.01)。

结论

鉴于严重创伤后 QOLIBRI 总分均值无明显差异,且认知缺陷仅略有差异,无论患者是否有严重脑损伤,结果均出乎意料,因此需要进一步研究 QOLIBRI 是否具有发现严重 TBI 特定残留的鉴别能力。实际上,该评分似乎表明不同类型严重创伤后存在精神缺陷,应更详细地评估。

试验注册

NCT02165137;于 2014 年 6 月 11 日回顾性注册。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/302b/6038178/179c69e1559b/12955_2018_966_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验