Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Department of Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Center for Primary Care Innovation, Institute for Public Health and Medicine, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
JAMA Intern Med. 2018 Aug 1;178(8):1069-1077. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.2372.
Complex medication regimens pose self-management challenges, particularly among populations with low levels of health literacy.
To test medication management tools delivered through a commercial electronic health record (EHR) with and without a nurse-led education intervention.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This 3-group cluster randomized clinical trial was performed in community health centers in Chicago, Illinois. Participants included 794 patients with hypertension who self-reported using 3 or more medications concurrently (for any purpose). Data were collected from April 30, 2012, through February 29, 2016, and analyzed by intention to treat.
Clinics were randomly assigned to to groups: electronic health record-based medication management tools (medication review sheets at visit check-in, lay medication information sheets printed after visits; EHR-alone group), EHR-based tools plus nurse-led medication management support (EHR plus education group), or usual care.
Outcomes at 12 months included systolic blood pressure (primary outcome), medication reconciliation, knowledge of drug indications, understanding of medication instructions and dosing, and self-reported medication adherence. Medication outcomes were assessed for all hypertension prescriptions, all prescriptions to treat chronic disease, and all medications.
Among the 794 participants (68.6% women; mean [SD] age, 52.7 [9.6] years), systolic blood pressure at 12 months was greater in the EHR-alone group compared with the usual care group by 3.6 mm Hg (95% CI, 0.3 to 6.9 mm Hg). Systolic blood pressure in the EHR plus education group was not significantly lower compared with the usual care group (difference, -2.0 mm Hg; 95% CI, -5.2 to 1.3 mm Hg) but was lower compared with the EHR-alone group (-5.6 mm Hg; 95% CI, -8.8 to -2.4 mm Hg). At 12 months, hypertension medication reconciliation was improved in the EHR-alone group (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 1.8; 95% CI, 1.1 to 2.9) and the EHR plus education group (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.0; 95% CI, 1.3 to 3.3) compared with usual care. Understanding of medication instructions and dosing was greater in the EHR plus education group than the usual care group for hypertension medications (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.1 to 4.8) and all medications combined (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.0 to 2.8). Compared with usual care, the EHR tools alone and EHR plus education interventions did not improve hypertension medication adherence (OR, 0.9; 95% CI, 0.6-1.4 for both) or knowledge of chronic drug indications (OR for EHR tools alone, 1.0 [95% CI, 0.6 to 1.5] and OR for EHR plus education, 1.1 [95% CI, 0.7-1.7]).
The study found that EHR tools in isolation improved medication reconciliation but worsened blood pressure. Combining these tools with nurse-led support suggested improved understanding of medication instructions and dosing but did not lower blood pressure compared with usual care.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01578577.
复杂的药物治疗方案带来了自我管理的挑战,尤其是在健康素养水平较低的人群中。
测试通过商业电子健康记录 (EHR) 提供的药物管理工具,以及是否结合护士主导的教育干预。
设计、地点和参与者:这是一项在伊利诺伊州芝加哥的社区医疗中心进行的 3 组聚类随机临床试验。参与者包括 794 名高血压患者,他们报告同时使用 3 种或更多药物(用于任何目的)。数据于 2012 年 4 月 30 日至 2016 年 2 月 29 日采集,并通过意向治疗进行分析。
诊所被随机分配到 3 组:基于电子健康记录的药物管理工具(就诊时检查登记的药物审查表,就诊后打印的简单用药信息表;EHR 单独组)、基于 EHR 的工具加护士主导的药物管理支持(EHR 加教育组)或常规护理。
12 个月的结果包括收缩压(主要结果)、药物一致性、药物适应证知识、对药物说明和剂量的理解,以及自我报告的药物依从性。对所有高血压处方、治疗慢性病的所有处方和所有药物进行药物结果评估。
在 794 名参与者中(68.6%为女性;平均[SD]年龄,52.7[9.6]岁),与常规护理组相比,EHR 单独组的收缩压在 12 个月时升高了 3.6mmHg(95%CI,0.3 至 6.9mmHg)。EHR 加教育组与常规护理组相比,收缩压无显著降低(差值,-2.0mmHg;95%CI,-5.2 至 1.3mmHg),但与 EHR 单独组相比收缩压降低了(差值,-5.6mmHg;95%CI,-8.8 至 -2.4mmHg)。在 12 个月时,EHR 单独组(调整后的优势比[OR],1.8;95%CI,1.1 至 2.9)和 EHR 加教育组(调整后的 OR,2.0;95%CI,1.3 至 3.3)的高血压药物一致性得到改善,与常规护理组相比。与常规护理组相比,EHR 加教育组对高血压药物(OR,2.3;95%CI,1.1 至 4.8)和所有药物(OR,1.7;95%CI,1.0 至 2.8)的药物说明和剂量理解程度更高。与常规护理相比,EHR 工具单独和 EHR 加教育干预均未改善高血压药物依从性(OR,0.9;95%CI,0.6-1.4)或慢性病药物适应证知识(EHR 工具单独的 OR,1.0[95%CI,0.6-1.5]和 EHR 加教育的 OR,1.1[95%CI,0.7-1.7])。
该研究发现,EHR 工具单独使用可改善药物一致性,但会升高血压。将这些工具与护士主导的支持相结合,提示对药物说明和剂量的理解有所改善,但与常规护理相比,血压并未降低。
ClinicalTrials.gov 标识符:NCT01578577。