Suppr超能文献

肌阵挛性癫痫患者癫痫样 EEG 放电的调制。

Modulation of epileptiform EEG discharges in patients with JME.

机构信息

Department of Neurology, GIPMER, New Delhi, India.

Department of Neurology, GIPMER, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Seizure. 2018 Aug;60:139-143. doi: 10.1016/j.seizure.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jun 28.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To study modulation of epileptiform EEG discharges in patients with JME.

METHOD

50 subjects with JME underwent a sleep deprived EEG recording along with conventional provocative methods and testing with cognitive tasks (CTs). Both categories of tests were evaluated for their effect on occurrence of IEDs. Number of IEDs per unit time was calculated at baseline as well as with each task. Statistical and arbitrary methods were used to assess modulation. By arbitrary method if frequency of IEDs was more than twice that of baseline, it was considered as provocation and if less than half, it was considered as inhibition. To account for spontaneous fluctuation of IEDs, 95% CI was calculated for baseline IEDs in each patient and provocation/inhibition was considered if frequency of IEDs exceeded/remained below limits of CI respectively.

RESULTS

There was no significant difference in rates of provocation of IEDs by conventional or CTs. However there was exclusive provocation of IEDs by CTs in 4 patients, 3 of whom were already on AEDs. There was a significant inhibitory effect of CTs as mean baseline discharge frequency was 0.4 ± 1.16 IEDS/min and during CTs was 0.1 ± 0.38 IEDs/min. However when spontaneous fluctuation was accounted for, inhibition was seen in only 22.23% patients by statistical method as compared to 90.91% by arbitrary method.

CONCLUSIONS

Inclusion of CTs may assist in provocation of IEDs, thereby increasing yield of routine EEG. Spontaneous fluctuation of IEDs accounts for much observed inhibition by CTs in JME patients.

摘要

目的

研究 JME 患者癫痫样 EEG 放电的调制。

方法

50 例 JME 患者进行了剥夺睡眠脑电图记录,同时进行了常规激发方法和认知任务(CTs)测试。评估这两种类型的测试对 IED 发生的影响。在基线以及每个任务时计算单位时间内的 IED 数量。使用统计和任意方法评估调制。根据任意方法,如果 IED 的频率是基线的两倍以上,则认为是激发,如果小于一半,则认为是抑制。为了说明 IED 的自发波动,为每个患者的基线 IED 计算了 95%CI,如果 IED 的频率超过/低于 CI 的限制,则认为是激发/抑制。

结果

常规或 CTs 引起 IED 激发的比率没有显著差异。然而,在 4 名患者中,CTs 引起了 IED 的特异性激发,其中 3 名患者已经在服用 AED。CTs 具有显著的抑制作用,因为平均基线放电频率为 0.4±1.16 IEDS/min,而在 CTs 期间为 0.1±0.38 IEDs/min。然而,当考虑到自发波动时,与任意方法的 90.91%相比,只有 22.23%的患者通过统计方法观察到抑制。

结论

包括 CTs 可能有助于激发 IED,从而增加常规 EEG 的产量。在 JME 患者中,CTs 观察到的抑制很大程度上归因于 IED 的自发波动。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验