Suppr超能文献

利用孤独观察解决间接互惠中的私人评估问题。

A solution for private assessment in indirect reciprocity using solitary observation.

机构信息

Soka University, Tokyo, Japan.

University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; F-Power Inc, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

J Theor Biol. 2018 Oct 14;455:7-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2018.06.018. Epub 2018 Jul 3.

Abstract

Although indirect reciprocity is a fundamental mechanism in the evolution of human cooperation, most studies assume public assessment in which individuals are not permitted to obtain private assessments of others. Existing studies on private assessment have used individual-based simulations because of the analytical difficulty involved. Here, we develop an analytical method using solitary observation to solve private assessment in indirect reciprocity problem without any approximation. In this study, we formulate a model of solitary observation and calculate the replicator dynamics systems of five leading norms of indirect reciprocity. Indirect reciprocity in private assessment provides a different result to that in public assessment. According to the existence proofs of cooperative evolutionarily stable (CES) points in the system, strict norms (stern judging and shunning) have no CES point in private assessment, while they do in public assessment. Image scoring does not change the system regardless of the assessment types because it does not use second-order information. In tolerant norms (simple standing and staying), the CES points move to co-existence of norms and unconditional cooperators. Despite the fact that there is no central coercive assessment system in private assessment, the average cooperation rate at the CES points in private assessment is greater than that in public assessment. This is because private assessment gives unconditional cooperators a role. Our results also show the superiority of the staying norm. Compared with simple standing, staying has three advantages in private assessment: a higher cooperation rate, easiness of invasion into defectors, and robustness to maintain cooperative evolutionarily stable situations. Our results are applicable to general social dilemmas in relation to private information. Under some dilemmas, norms or assessment rules should be carefully chosen to enable cooperation to evolve.

摘要

虽然间接互惠是人类合作进化的基本机制,但大多数研究都假设存在公共评估,即不允许个体获得对他人的私人评估。由于涉及到分析上的困难,现有的关于私人评估的研究都使用了基于个体的模拟方法。在这里,我们开发了一种使用单独观察的分析方法,无需任何近似即可解决间接互惠问题中的私人评估。在这项研究中,我们构建了一个单独观察的模型,并计算了五种主要间接互惠规范的复制者动力学系统。在私人评估中,间接互惠产生了与公共评估不同的结果。根据系统中合作进化稳定(CES)点的存在证明,在私人评估中严格规范(严厉评判和回避)没有 CES 点,而在公共评估中则有。形象评分无论评估类型如何都不会改变系统,因为它不使用二阶信息。在宽容规范(简单的站着和待着)中,CES 点移动到规范和无条件合作者的共存。尽管在私人评估中没有中央强制评估系统,但在 CES 点的平均合作率大于公共评估中的平均合作率。这是因为私人评估为无条件合作者赋予了角色。我们的结果还显示了停留规范的优越性。与简单站立相比,停留规范在私人评估中有三个优势:更高的合作率、更容易入侵缺陷者以及保持合作进化稳定状态的稳健性。我们的结果适用于涉及私人信息的一般社会困境。在某些困境下,应仔细选择规范或评估规则,以促进合作的进化。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验