Horkoff Michael, Purich Kieran, Switzer Noah, Prasad Shalvin, Church Neal, Shi Xinzhe, Mitchell Philip, Debru Estifanos, Karmali Shahzeer, Gill Richdeep
Department of Surgery, University of Calgary, 1023 North Tower, 1403-29 Street NW, Calgary, AB, Canada T2N 2T9.
Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, 2J2.00 WC Mackenzie Health Sciences Centre, University of Alberta, 8440 112 Street NW, Edmonton, AB, Canada T6G 2R7.
J Obes. 2018 May 29;2018:6959786. doi: 10.1155/2018/6959786. eCollection 2018.
The laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) is prone to a number of complications, most notably at the gastrojejunostomy (GJ) staple line. The circular stapler technique is a common method used to create the GJ anastomosis. Although recent studies have shown a decreased rate of anastomotic strictures with shorter stapler heights, the optimal circular stapler height to use remains controversial. We therefore completed a retrospective cohort study within the Alberta Provincial Bariatric Program (APBP) to compare outcomes between the 3.5 mm and 4.8 mm stapler heights. We identified 215 patients who had a LRYGB done between the years 2015 and 2017. 143 patients had the GJ constructed with a 3.5 mm circular stapler height, with the remaining 72 patients having the GJ fashioned with a 4.8 mm stapler height. The rate of anastomotic stricturing was lower in the 3.5 mm stapler group compared to the other cohort (3.5 versus 13.9%, resp., =0.008). Likewise, the overall rate of bleeding complications was lower in the 3.5 mm stapler group compared to the 4.8 mm group (6.3 versus 15.3%, resp., =0.04). The rate of anastomotic stricturing and postoperative bleeding is lower with the use of a 3.5 mm circular stapler compared to a 4.8 mm circular stapler when forming the GJ.
腹腔镜Roux-en-Y胃旁路术(LRYGB)容易出现多种并发症,最显著的是在胃空肠吻合术(GJ)吻合钉线处。圆形吻合器技术是创建GJ吻合的常用方法。尽管最近的研究表明,使用较短的吻合器高度可降低吻合口狭窄的发生率,但最佳的圆形吻合器高度仍存在争议。因此,我们在艾伯塔省省级肥胖症治疗项目(APBP)中完成了一项回顾性队列研究,以比较3.5毫米和4.8毫米吻合器高度的手术效果。我们确定了2015年至2017年间接受LRYGB手术的215例患者。143例患者采用3.5毫米圆形吻合器高度构建GJ,其余72例患者采用4.8毫米吻合器高度构建GJ。与另一组相比,3.5毫米吻合器组的吻合口狭窄发生率较低(分别为3.5%和13.9%,P=0.008)。同样,3.5毫米吻合器组的出血并发症总发生率低于4.8毫米组(分别为6.3%和15.3%,P=0.04)。在形成GJ时,使用3.5毫米圆形吻合器比4.8毫米圆形吻合器的吻合口狭窄率和术后出血率更低。