Heart and Lung Institute, University of Laval, , G1V 4G5 Quebec, Canada.
J Rehabil Med. 2018 Aug 22;50(8):759-764. doi: 10.2340/16501977-2354.
To investigate the interday test-retest reliability of volitional and non-volitional measurements of isometric quadriceps strength using a strain-gauge in people with severe to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.
Cross-sectional study. Volitional quadriceps measurements consisted of isometric maximal voluntary contractions. Non-volitional measurements were obtained during magnetic potentiated twitch stimulations of the femoral nerve.
Research centre laboratory.
Twenty-four individuals with severe to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (percentage of predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 s, 37% predicted).
Maximal voluntary contractions and potentiated twitch stimulations measures demonstrated excellent interday test-retest relative reliability (ICC 0.97 and 0.80, respectively), while absolute reliability measures were different between techniques (SEM 1.4 kg, CV 3.2%, MDC 3.9 kg vs SEM 1.5 kg, CV 12.2%, MDC 4.2 kg for maximal voluntary contractions and potentiated twitch stimulations, respectively).
The results supports that maximal voluntary contraction and potentiated twitch stimulation measurements of isometric quadriceps strength are reliable in people with severe to very severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease as evident excellent relative reliability using both techniques, although the former technique appears to have better absolute reliability.
研究使用应变片在严重至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者中测量等长股四头肌力量的自主和非自主测试-重测信度。
横断面研究。自主股四头肌测量包括等长最大自主收缩。非自主测量是在股神经磁增强抽搐刺激期间获得的。
研究中心实验室。
24 名严重至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者(预计 1 秒用力呼气量的百分比,预测值的 37%)。
最大自主收缩和增强抽搐刺激测量显示出极好的日内测试-重测相对可靠性(ICC 分别为 0.97 和 0.80),而两种技术的绝对可靠性测量值不同(SEM 分别为 1.4kg、CV 为 3.2%、MDC 为 3.9kg 和 SEM 为 1.5kg、CV 为 12.2%、MDC 为 4.2kg)。
结果支持严重至极重度慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者的最大自主收缩和增强抽搐刺激测量等长股四头肌力量是可靠的,两种技术均具有极好的相对可靠性,尽管前者技术的绝对可靠性似乎更好。