Little M, Van Walbeek C
Economics of Tobacco Control Project, Southern Africa Labour and Development Research Unit, School of Economics, University of Cape Town, South Africa.
S Afr Med J. 2018 Feb 27;108(3):240-244. doi: 10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i3.12683.
The South African Minister of Health announced in 2016 that he intends to introduce tobacco control legislation that will prohibit smoking in restaurants. This will substantially strengthen the Tobacco Products Control Act (1993, as amended), which currently allows restaurants to have a dedicated, enclosed indoor smoking area.
To analyse current smoking policies of restaurants, whether and how these policies have changed over the past decade, and restaurateurs' attitudes to the proposed legislative changes.
From a population of nearly 12 000 restaurants, derived from four websites, we sampled 2 000 restaurants, stratifying by province and type (independent v. chain) and disproportionately sampling small strata to ensure meaningful analysis. We successfully surveyed 741 restaurants, mostly by phone. We also surveyed 60 franchisors from a population of 82 franchisors.
Of the restaurants sampled, 44% were 100% smoke-free, 44% had smoking sections outside, 11% had smoking sections inside, and 1% allowed smoking anywhere. Smoking areas were more common in independent restaurants (62%) than franchised restaurants (43%). Of the restaurants with a smoking section, 33% reported that the smoking sections were busier than the non-smoking sections. Twenty-three percent of restaurants had made changes to their smoking policies in the past 10 years, mostly removing or reducing the size of the smoking sections. Customer requests (39%), compliance with the law (35%) and cost and revenue pressures (14%) were the main reasons for changing smoking policies. Of the restaurant respondents 91% supported the current legislation, while 63% supported the proposed legislative changes; 68% of respondents who were aware of the proposed legislation supported it, compared with 58% of respondents who were not aware of the proposed legislation.
In contrast to the vehement opposition to the 1999 legislation, which resulted in restaurants going partially smoke-free in 2001, there was limited opposition from restaurants to the proposed legislative changes that would make restaurants 100% smoke-free. Support for the proposed legislation will probably increase as the restaurant industry and the public are made more aware of the proposed legislative changes, although public opinion is vulnerable to tobacco industry-led campaigns.
南非卫生部长在2016年宣布,他打算出台烟草控制立法,禁止在餐馆吸烟。这将大幅加强《烟草制品控制法》(1993年,经修订),该法目前允许餐馆设有专门的封闭室内吸烟区。
分析餐馆当前的吸烟政策,这些政策在过去十年是否以及如何发生了变化,以及餐馆老板对拟议立法变化的态度。
从四个网站获取的近12000家餐馆的总体中,我们抽取了2000家餐馆作为样本,按省份和类型(独立餐馆与连锁餐馆)分层,并对小层进行不成比例抽样,以确保有意义的分析。我们成功调查了741家餐馆,主要通过电话进行。我们还从82家特许经营商的总体中调查了60家特许经营商。
在抽样的餐馆中,44%完全无烟,44%在室外设有吸烟区,11%在室内设有吸烟区,1%允许在任何地方吸烟。吸烟区在独立餐馆(62%)比特许经营餐馆(43%)更常见。在设有吸烟区的餐馆中,33%报告称吸烟区比非吸烟区更繁忙。23%的餐馆在过去10年里对其吸烟政策进行了更改,主要是取消或缩小吸烟区的规模。顾客要求(39%)、守法(35%)以及成本和收入压力(14%)是改变吸烟政策的主要原因。在餐馆受访者中,91%支持现行立法,而63%支持拟议的立法变化;68%知晓拟议立法的受访者支持该立法,相比之下,58%不知晓拟议立法的受访者支持该立法。
与1999年立法遭到的强烈反对形成对比(1999年立法导致餐馆在2001年部分实现无烟),餐馆对拟议的使餐馆完全无烟的立法变化的反对有限。随着餐馆行业和公众对拟议立法变化的了解增多,对拟议立法的支持可能会增加,尽管公众舆论容易受到烟草行业主导的活动的影响。