Department of Nursing, Shinsung University, 1 Daehak-ro, Jeongmi-myeon, Dangjin-si, Chungcheongnam-do, 31801, Republic of Korea.
College of Nursing, Eulji University, 77 Gyeryong-ro, 771 beon-gil, Jung-gu, Daejeon 34824, Republic of Korea.
Nurse Educ Today. 2018 Oct;69:14-19. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2018.06.023. Epub 2018 Jun 30.
Nursing handovers are a crucial nursing practice for patient safety and continuity of nursing care. As a strategy to improve nursing handovers, it has been suggested that new graduate nurses receive training in how to conduct handovers.
The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of simulation-based handover training and peer-learning handover training on clinical competence regarding handovers and clinical judgment among new graduate nurses.
Quasi-experimental research using a nonequivalent control group post-test design.
A convenience sample of 55 new graduate nurses with no clinical experience who expected to work at a university hospital were selected.
We measured participants' clinical competence regarding handovers and clinical judgment immediately after completing a training program and after 1 month of working at a hospital to examine the immediate and latent effects of simulation-based and peer-learning handover training, respectively. A researcher-developed clinical competence instrument regarding handovers and a clinical judgment instrument based on the Lasater Clinical Judgment Rubric were used. To identify differences in the effects of simulation-based and peer-learning handover training, we analyzed the data using the independent t-test and paired t-test. When evaluating the latent effects, the participants wrote self-reflection reports.
There were no significant differences in the immediate effects of the simulation-based training and the peer-learning training. In contrast, in the evaluation of the latent effects, new graduate nurses who received simulation-based training showed significantly higher clinical competence regarding handovers (p = .020) and clinical judgment (p = .033) than their counterparts who received peer-learning training. In the self-reflection reports, 19 participants stated that they had gained more confidence with handovers.
We suggest that simulation-based handover training contributes more to the improvement of new graduate nurses' clinical competence regarding handovers and clinical judgment than peer-learning training.
护理交接班是保障患者安全和护理连续性的关键护理实践。为了提高护理交接班的质量,有人建议对新毕业护士进行交接班培训。
本研究旨在检验基于模拟的交接班培训和同伴学习交接班培训对新毕业护士交接班和临床判断的临床能力的影响。
采用非等同对照组前后测试设计的准实验研究。
选择了 55 名没有临床经验但预计在大学医院工作的新毕业护士作为方便样本。
我们在完成培训计划后立即以及在医院工作 1 个月后测量了参与者的交接班和临床判断的临床能力,以分别检验基于模拟的和同伴学习的交接班培训的即时和潜在效果。使用研究者开发的交接班临床能力工具和基于 Lasater 临床判断量表的临床判断工具。为了识别基于模拟的和同伴学习的交接班培训效果的差异,我们使用独立 t 检验和配对 t 检验进行数据分析。在评估潜在效果时,参与者撰写了自我反思报告。
基于模拟的培训和同伴学习培训的即时效果没有显著差异。相比之下,在评估潜在效果时,接受基于模拟的培训的新毕业护士在交接班临床能力(p=0.020)和临床判断(p=0.033)方面明显优于接受同伴学习培训的新毕业护士。在自我反思报告中,有 19 名参与者表示他们在交接班方面更有信心。
与同伴学习培训相比,基于模拟的交接班培训更有助于提高新毕业护士的交接班和临床判断的临床能力。