Department of Analytical Environmental Chemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, D-04318, Leipzig, Germany; University of Halle-Wittenberg, Institute of Chemistry, Kurt-Mothes-Str. 2, D-06120 Halle, Germany.
Department of Analytical Environmental Chemistry, Helmholtz Centre for Environmental Research, UFZ, D-04318, Leipzig, Germany.
Chemosphere. 2018 Nov;210:341-346. doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.07.017. Epub 2018 Jul 5.
Current bioaccumulation regulation is focused on bioconcentration in fish. An extension to terrestrial mammals, e.g. rat, is urgently needed but will have to use a different metric, most likely the BMF. While both metrics are thermodynamically not equivalent the regulative testing requirements for both might be reduced to the investigation of the respective elimination rate constants k for fish or rat. These k values could be derived from animal tests or from in vitro - in vivo extrapolation and could be combined with estimated uptake rate constants to yield either a BCF or a BMF value. The possibility to use in vitro methods for k has the advantage that animal tests can be avoided and it bears the chance to experimentally cover species differences which are currently ignored in bioaccumulation regulation. Existing data for BCF and the respective k values for fish - either from feeding studies or from BCF studies themselves-indicate that this approach works. For terrestrial bioaccumulation this approach still needs further experimental support.
现行的生物蓄积法规主要关注鱼类中的生物浓缩。迫切需要将其扩展到陆地哺乳动物,例如大鼠,但这将不得不使用不同的指标,最有可能是生物蓄积系数(BMF)。虽然这两种指标在热力学上并不等效,但对于这两种指标的监管测试要求都可以简化为研究鱼类或大鼠各自的消除速率常数 k。这些 k 值可以从动物试验或体外-体内外推中得出,并与估计的摄取速率常数结合,得出生物浓缩因子(BCF)或生物蓄积系数(BMF)值。使用体外方法来确定 k 的可能性具有避免动物试验的优势,并且有机会在实验中涵盖目前在生物蓄积法规中被忽视的物种差异。现有的鱼类 BCF 及其相应的 k 值数据——无论是来自喂养研究还是 BCF 研究本身——表明这种方法是可行的。对于陆地生物蓄积,这种方法仍需要进一步的实验支持。