Department of Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia; The University of Queensland, Faculty of Medicine, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Department of Cardiology, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, Qld, Australia.
Heart Lung Circ. 2019 Jul;28(7):1027-1033. doi: 10.1016/j.hlc.2018.05.196. Epub 2018 Jun 27.
Chronic right ventricular pacing may contribute to deterioration in left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). The aim of the study was to identify the prevalence of pacing-induced cardiomyopathy (PICM) in patients with chronic right ventricular pacing.
Patients attending a pacemaker clinic were retrospectively identified as having had transthoracic echocardiographic LVEF measurement during the 12 months prior to device implantation. Those with cardioverter-defibrillators or biventricular devices were excluded. The remaining patients were invited back for a repeat echocardiogram. Three (3) different definitions of PICM were employed: 1) follow-up LVEF of ≤40% if baseline LVEF was ≥50%, or an absolute reduction in LVEF ≥5% if baseline LVEF was <50%; 2) follow-up LVEF of ≤40% if baseline LVEF was ≥50%, or an absolute reduction in LVEF ≥10% if baseline LVEF was ≤50%; 3) absolute reduction in LVEF ≥10% irrespective of baseline LVEF. Alternate causes of cardiomyopathy were excluded following a chart review.
The study cohort of 118 included 67 males (mean age 77.8±10.5years) and 51 females (mean age 76.8±11.2years). The mean time between baseline and follow-up echocardiograms was 3.5+1.4years (range 1.5-6.4 years). The prevalence of PICM ranged from 5.9 to 39.0% depending on PICM definition. Multivariate analysis found that PICM was significantly associated with ventricular pacing burden (p=0.013).
The prevalence of pacing induced cardiomyopathy is dependent on current accepted clinical definitions. A clear definition of PICM is required for a better understanding of the clinical implications of right ventricular pacing.
慢性右心室起搏可能导致左心室射血分数(LVEF)下降。本研究旨在确定慢性右心室起搏患者起搏诱导性心肌病(PICM)的患病率。
回顾性地确定在装置植入前 12 个月内接受经胸超声心动图 LVEF 测量的起搏器诊所就诊的患者。排除具有除颤器或双心室装置的患者。其余患者被邀请回来进行重复超声心动图检查。采用三种(3)种不同的 PICM 定义:1)如果基线 LVEF≥50%,则随访 LVEF≤40%,或基线 LVEF<50%,则 LVEF 绝对降低≥5%;2)如果基线 LVEF≥50%,则随访 LVEF≤40%,或基线 LVEF≤50%,则 LVEF 绝对降低≥10%;3)无论基线 LVEF 如何,LVEF 的绝对降低≥10%。通过图表审查排除了心肌病的其他可能原因。
研究队列包括 118 例患者,其中 67 例男性(平均年龄 77.8±10.5 岁)和 51 例女性(平均年龄 76.8±11.2 岁)。基线和随访超声心动图之间的平均时间为 3.5+1.4 年(范围 1.5-6.4 年)。根据 PICM 定义,PICM 的患病率从 5.9%到 39.0%不等。多变量分析发现,PICM 与心室起搏负担显著相关(p=0.013)。
起搏诱导性心肌病的患病率取决于当前公认的临床定义。需要明确的 PICM 定义,以便更好地了解右心室起搏的临床意义。