Department of Medicine, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.
Department of Quality, Patient Safety, and Clinical Effectiveness, Stanford Health Care, Stanford, CA.
J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Oct;227(4):404-410.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2018.06.011. Epub 2018 Jul 18.
Patients with increasing age and medical complexity are undergoing colorectal surgery. Medical complications are not uncommon and may contribute to higher mortality. We implemented a surgical comanagement (SCM) model in July 2014 at our institution, where the same 2 SCM hospitalists were dedicated to colorectal surgery year round. Each patient was screened daily by an SCM hospitalist for prevention and management of medical complications. Before SCM, hospitalists were typically consulted after medical complications had occurred.
We conducted a pre/post study at an academic medical center with 938 patients in the pre-SCM group (July 2012 to June 2014), and 1,062 patients in the post-SCM group (July 2014 to May 2016). We evaluated whether SCM by hospitalists improved outcomes of patients in colorectal surgery.
There was no significant difference in medical complications, patient satisfaction, or 30-day readmission rate to our institution for medical cause with the SCM intervention. This intervention was associated with a significant decrease in the proportion of patients transferred to the ICU after rapid response team calls (relative risk [RR] 0.25 [95% CI 0.05 to 0.84], p = 0.039), proportion of patients with length of stay (LOS) ≥ 5 days (RR 0.73 [95% CI 0.64 to 0.83], p < 0.001), use of medical consultants (RR 0.75 [95% CI 0.63 to 0.89], p = 0.001), and the median direct cost of care by 10.3% (p = 0.0002).
Surgical comanagement intervention was associated with a decrease in transfers to the ICU after rapid response team call, LOS, medical consultants, and the cost of care.
越来越多的老年和合并症患者正在接受结直肠手术。医疗并发症并不罕见,可能导致更高的死亡率。我们于 2014 年 7 月在我院实施了外科共管(SCM)模式,同两名 SCM 主治医生全年专注于结直肠手术。每位患者都由 SCM 主治医生每天筛查,以预防和管理医疗并发症。在 SCM 之前,主治医生通常是在发生医疗并发症后才被咨询。
我们在一家学术医疗中心进行了一项前后对照研究,共有 938 例患者在 SCM 前组(2012 年 7 月至 2014 年 6 月),1062 例患者在 SCM 后组(2014 年 7 月至 2016 年 5 月)。我们评估了主治医生的 SCM 是否改善了结直肠手术患者的结局。
SCM 干预措施与医疗并发症、患者满意度或因医疗原因 30 天内再次入院率无显著差异。这一干预措施与快速反应团队呼叫后转入 ICU 的患者比例显著降低(相对风险 [RR] 0.25 [95%CI 0.05 至 0.84],p = 0.039)、住院时间(LOS)≥5 天的患者比例(RR 0.73 [95%CI 0.64 至 0.83],p < 0.001)、使用医疗顾问的比例(RR 0.75 [95%CI 0.63 至 0.89],p = 0.001)以及医疗费用中位数降低了 10.3%(p = 0.0002)有关。
外科共管干预与快速反应团队呼叫后转入 ICU、LOS、医疗顾问和医疗费用的降低有关。