Universidade do - Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Universidade do - Estado do Rio de Janeiro - UERJ, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
J Prosthodont Res. 2019 Jan;63(1):47-51. doi: 10.1016/j.jpor.2018.06.004. Epub 2018 Jul 19.
The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the stability of removable implant-supported maxillary overdentures with fixed complete dentures and conventional dentures.
Four types of complete dentures were tested: conventional complete dentures; overdentures retained by a male resilient attachment system; overdentures retained by a combination of clip bar and attachment system; and fixed complete dentures. Each group was placed in the posterior and anterior region and the stability was recorded by measuring the vertical displacement of the prosthesis.
There was a difference in the vertical movement of the prosthesis according to the type of system. The results showed that the behavior of the overdenture retained by a combination of a clip bar and attachment system is comparable with the stabilization of an implant-retained fixed complete denture.
Overdentures retained by a combination of a clip bar and attachment presented better stability and retention capacity under our experimental conditions, close to that of the positive control (fixed complete denture), with the advantages of removable overdentures.
本体外研究旨在比较可摘式种植体支持的上颌覆盖义齿与固定全口义齿和常规义齿的稳定性。
对四种全口义齿进行了测试:常规全口义齿;由男性弹性附着体系统固位的覆盖义齿;夹管和附着体系统联合固位的覆盖义齿;以及固定全口义齿。每个组都被放置在后牙区和前牙区,并通过测量义齿的垂直位移来记录稳定性。
根据系统类型,义齿的垂直运动有差异。结果表明,夹管和附着体联合固位的覆盖义齿的行为与种植体固位的固定全口义齿的稳定性相当。
在我们的实验条件下,夹管和附着体联合固位的覆盖义齿具有更好的稳定性和固位能力,接近阳性对照(固定全口义齿),同时具有可摘覆盖义齿的优点。