Suppr超能文献

英国贝德福德郡 50 家普通实践中哮喘护理的回顾。

A review of asthma care in 50 general practices in Bedfordshire, United Kingdom.

机构信息

Respiratory Clinical Lead, Harrow Clinical Commissioning Group, Harrow, UK.

NHS Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group, Bedford, UK.

出版信息

NPJ Prim Care Respir Med. 2018 Jul 26;28(1):29. doi: 10.1038/s41533-018-0093-7.

Abstract

The United Kingdom (UK) National Review of Asthma Deaths (NRAD) (2011-2014) identified a number of contributory risk factors which had not previously been recognized by those caring for people with asthma. Only one of the 19 NRAD recommendations has so far been implemented nationally, and that only partially, and as yet systems are not in place to identify patients at risk of attacks and dying from asthma. In 2015/2016 Bedfordshire Clinical Commissioning Group (CCG) in England, UK, initiated a quality asthma audit of people with asthma to identify some of the risk factors identified in the NRAD report with the aim of optimizing patient care. Fifty (89%) of the General Practices caring for 415,152 patients (27,587 diagnosed with asthma (prevalence 7%; range 4-12%)), participated and the results identified a wide variation in process of care and presence of risk factors including: excess short acting reliever and insufficient preventer prescriptions, failure to issue personal asthma action plans, and to perform annual reviews or check inhaler technique. Identification of these patients involved high-intensity input by trained asthma nurses using sophisticated data extraction software. GP computer systems used in primary care currently do not have the functionally, without the need for manual audit, to implement the NRAD recommendations, starting with the identification of patients at risk. Modifications to existing systems within both primary and secondary care are required in order to prevent unnecessary deaths related to asthma. There is a pressing need to move towards a more pro-active model of care.

摘要

英国国家哮喘死亡回顾(NRAD)(2011-2014 年)确定了一些以前未被哮喘患者护理人员认识到的促成风险因素。到目前为止,NRAD 的 19 项建议中只有一项在全国范围内得到实施,而且只是部分实施,到目前为止,还没有系统来识别有哮喘发作和死亡风险的患者。2015/2016 年,英国贝德福德郡临床委托组(CCG)启动了一项针对哮喘患者的质量哮喘审计,以确定 NRAD 报告中确定的一些风险因素,旨在优化患者护理。有 50 家(89%)为 415152 名患者提供服务的普通诊所(27587 名被诊断患有哮喘(患病率为 7%;范围为 4-12%))参与了该审计,结果发现护理过程和风险因素的存在存在广泛差异,包括:过度使用短效缓解药物和预防药物不足、未能发放个人哮喘行动计划,以及未能进行年度检查或检查吸入器使用技术。这些患者的识别涉及到经过培训的哮喘护士使用复杂的数据提取软件进行高强度的投入。初级保健中使用的 GP 计算机系统目前没有功能,不需要手动审计,就无法实施 NRAD 建议,首先要确定有风险的患者。需要对初级保健和二级保健中的现有系统进行修改,以防止与哮喘相关的不必要死亡。迫切需要转向更积极主动的护理模式。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6d/6062519/1e3c83f1b24d/41533_2018_93_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验