Li Simiao, Fant Abra L, McCarthy Danielle M, Miller Danielle, Craig Jill, Kontrick Amy
Department of Emergency Medicine Northwestern McGaw Medical Center Chicago IL.
AEM Educ Train. 2017 Sep 19;1(4):334-339. doi: 10.1002/aet2.10057. eCollection 2017 Oct.
While gender differences in language for letters of recommendation have been identified in other fields, no prior studies have evaluated the narrative portion of the emergency medicine (EM) standardized letter of evaluation (SLOE). We aim to examine the differences in language used to describe male and female applicants within the SLOE narrative.
Invited applicants to a 4-year academic EM residency program within a single application year with a SLOE were included in the sample. Exclusion criteria were SLOE of applicants from non-Liaison Committee on Medical Education (LCME) schools or first rotation SLOE not available for download. Data were collected on applicant gender, age, rotation grade, Alpha Omega Alpha designation, and medical school rank. The previously validated Linguistic Inquiry and Word Count (LIWC) program was used to analyze frequency of words within categories relevant to letters of recommendation. Descriptive statistics, t-tests, and chi-square tests were employed in analysis.
Of 1,025 applicants within a single application year, 265 were invited to interview; 237 applicants had a first rotation SLOE available for analysis. There were no differences between male and female applicants for baseline characteristics. The median word count per SLOE narrative was 199; within the LIWC dictionary and user-defined categories, words within the categories of affiliation and ability appeared more frequently for female applicants.
Our results with respect to the SLOE narrative reinforce prior research that letters of recommendation for female applicants highlight communal characteristics of teamwork, helpfulness, and compassion. Contrary to prior research, ability words highlighting intelligence and skill appeared with greater frequency for female applicants. No pervasive differences were found in other word categories. In this sample, the standardized format of the SLOE resulted in letters that were relatively free of gender bias.
虽然在其他领域已发现推荐信语言存在性别差异,但此前尚无研究评估急诊医学(EM)标准化评估信(SLOE)的叙述部分。我们旨在研究SLOE叙述中用于描述男性和女性申请者的语言差异。
样本纳入在单个申请年份受邀申请为期4年的学术性EM住院医师项目且有SLOE的申请者。排除标准为来自非医学教育联络委员会(LCME)学校的申请者的SLOE或无法下载的首次轮转SLOE。收集了申请者的性别、年龄、轮转成绩、阿尔法欧米伽阿尔法荣誉(Alpha Omega Alpha designation)以及医学院排名等数据。使用先前验证过的语言查询与字数统计(LIWC)程序分析与推荐信相关类别中的词汇频率。分析采用描述性统计、t检验和卡方检验。
在单个申请年份的1025名申请者中,265人受邀参加面试;237名申请者有可供分析的首次轮转SLOE。男性和女性申请者的基线特征无差异。每份SLOE叙述的中位数单词数为199;在LIWC词典和用户定义类别中,女性申请者在归属和能力类别中的词汇出现频率更高。
我们关于SLOE叙述的结果强化了先前的研究,即女性申请者的推荐信突出了团队合作、乐于助人及同情心等集体特征。与先前研究相反,突出智力和技能的能力类词汇在女性申请者的推荐信中出现频率更高。在其他词汇类别中未发现普遍差异。在本样本中,SLOE的标准化格式使得推荐信相对没有性别偏见。