Suppr超能文献

WHO 慢性髓单核细胞白血病分类 2017 年修订版的验证。

Validation of the 2017 revision of the WHO chronic myelomonocytic leukemia categories.

机构信息

Department of Hematopathology.

Department of Biostatistics, and.

出版信息

Blood Adv. 2018 Aug 14;2(15):1807-1816. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018019224.

Abstract

The 2017 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification includes substantial changes to the subclassification of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML): (1) a 3-tiered blast-based scheme including a novel "CMML-0" category replacing a 2-tiered system in place since 2001 and (2) 2 CMML subtypes, myelodysplastic (MDS-CMML) and myeloproliferative (MP-CMML), based on a white blood cell count cutoff of 13 × 10/L. The clinical utility of this subclassification scheme, particularly the expansion of blast-based subgroups, has not been validated. In this study, a large single-institution CMML patient cohort (n = 629) was used to assess the prognostic impact of the newly proposed categories. Patients were risk stratified according to the CMML-specific Prognostic Scoring System (CPSS) and the MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System. MP-CMML patients had significantly shorter overall survival (OS; < .0001; hazard ratio: 0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.65) and median duration to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation ( < .0001; 15.2 vs 22.0 months) compared with MDS-CMML patients. The CMML-0 group included 36.4% patients with higher risk CPSS categories and 11.2% of patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Among treatment-naïve patients (n = 499), there was a marginal difference in OS between the CMML-0 and CMML-1 subgroups ( = .0552). The WHO 2017 blast-based categories were not associated with AML-free survival. Incorporation of the WHO 2017 blast-based subgroups in a modified CPSS scheme had a neutral effect and did not improve its prognostic strength. Our data support the inclusion of MP-CMML and MDS-CMML subtypes in the WHO 2017 revision. Although of some utility in MP-CMML, the 3-tiered blast-based system is not well supported in this study.

摘要

2017 年版世界卫生组织(WHO)分类对慢性髓单核细胞白血病(CMML)的亚分类进行了重大修改:(1)基于原始 2 级系统的 3 级基于 blast 的方案,包括一个新的“CMML-0”类别,(2)2 个 CMML 亚型,骨髓增生异常(MDS-CMML)和骨髓增殖性(MP-CMML),基于白细胞计数的 13×10/L 截止值。这种亚分类方案的临床实用性,特别是基于 blast 的亚组的扩展,尚未得到验证。在这项研究中,使用大型单一机构 CMML 患者队列(n=629)来评估新提出的分类的预后影响。患者根据 CMML 特异性预后评分系统(CPSS)和 MD 安德森预后评分系统进行风险分层。MP-CMML 患者的总生存期(OS)明显更短( <.0001;风险比:0.53,95%置信区间:0.42-0.65),急性髓细胞白血病(AML)转化的中位时间更短( <.0001;15.2 个月比 22.0 个月),与 MDS-CMML 患者相比。CMML-0 组包括 36.4%的 CPSS 高危分类患者和 11.2%的高危细胞遗传学患者。在未经治疗的患者(n=499)中,CMML-0 和 CMML-1 亚组之间的 OS 存在微小差异( =.0552)。WHO 2017 年基于 blast 的分类与 AML 无进展生存无关。在改良 CPSS 方案中纳入 WHO 2017 年基于 blast 的亚组对其预后强度没有影响。我们的数据支持在 WHO 2017 年修订版中纳入 MP-CMML 和 MDS-CMML 亚型。尽管在 MP-CMML 中具有一定的实用性,但在这项研究中,3 级基于 blast 的系统并未得到很好的支持。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ddfa/6093727/6f3131e50bcd/advances019224absf1.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验