Department of Hematopathology.
Department of Biostatistics, and.
Blood Adv. 2018 Aug 14;2(15):1807-1816. doi: 10.1182/bloodadvances.2018019224.
The 2017 revision of the World Health Organization (WHO) classification includes substantial changes to the subclassification of chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML): (1) a 3-tiered blast-based scheme including a novel "CMML-0" category replacing a 2-tiered system in place since 2001 and (2) 2 CMML subtypes, myelodysplastic (MDS-CMML) and myeloproliferative (MP-CMML), based on a white blood cell count cutoff of 13 × 10/L. The clinical utility of this subclassification scheme, particularly the expansion of blast-based subgroups, has not been validated. In this study, a large single-institution CMML patient cohort (n = 629) was used to assess the prognostic impact of the newly proposed categories. Patients were risk stratified according to the CMML-specific Prognostic Scoring System (CPSS) and the MD Anderson Prognostic Scoring System. MP-CMML patients had significantly shorter overall survival (OS; < .0001; hazard ratio: 0.53, 95% confidence interval: 0.42-0.65) and median duration to acute myeloid leukemia (AML) transformation ( < .0001; 15.2 vs 22.0 months) compared with MDS-CMML patients. The CMML-0 group included 36.4% patients with higher risk CPSS categories and 11.2% of patients with high-risk cytogenetics. Among treatment-naïve patients (n = 499), there was a marginal difference in OS between the CMML-0 and CMML-1 subgroups ( = .0552). The WHO 2017 blast-based categories were not associated with AML-free survival. Incorporation of the WHO 2017 blast-based subgroups in a modified CPSS scheme had a neutral effect and did not improve its prognostic strength. Our data support the inclusion of MP-CMML and MDS-CMML subtypes in the WHO 2017 revision. Although of some utility in MP-CMML, the 3-tiered blast-based system is not well supported in this study.
2017 年版世界卫生组织(WHO)分类对慢性髓单核细胞白血病(CMML)的亚分类进行了重大修改:(1)基于原始 2 级系统的 3 级基于 blast 的方案,包括一个新的“CMML-0”类别,(2)2 个 CMML 亚型,骨髓增生异常(MDS-CMML)和骨髓增殖性(MP-CMML),基于白细胞计数的 13×10/L 截止值。这种亚分类方案的临床实用性,特别是基于 blast 的亚组的扩展,尚未得到验证。在这项研究中,使用大型单一机构 CMML 患者队列(n=629)来评估新提出的分类的预后影响。患者根据 CMML 特异性预后评分系统(CPSS)和 MD 安德森预后评分系统进行风险分层。MP-CMML 患者的总生存期(OS)明显更短( <.0001;风险比:0.53,95%置信区间:0.42-0.65),急性髓细胞白血病(AML)转化的中位时间更短( <.0001;15.2 个月比 22.0 个月),与 MDS-CMML 患者相比。CMML-0 组包括 36.4%的 CPSS 高危分类患者和 11.2%的高危细胞遗传学患者。在未经治疗的患者(n=499)中,CMML-0 和 CMML-1 亚组之间的 OS 存在微小差异( =.0552)。WHO 2017 年基于 blast 的分类与 AML 无进展生存无关。在改良 CPSS 方案中纳入 WHO 2017 年基于 blast 的亚组对其预后强度没有影响。我们的数据支持在 WHO 2017 年修订版中纳入 MP-CMML 和 MDS-CMML 亚型。尽管在 MP-CMML 中具有一定的实用性,但在这项研究中,3 级基于 blast 的系统并未得到很好的支持。