Suppr超能文献

力量匹配中的不对称与右利手个体的中风侧有关。

Asymmetries in force matching are related to side of stroke in right-handed individuals.

作者信息

Anderson Charlie, Rajamani Kumar, Pardo Victoria, Adamo Diane E

机构信息

Department of Physical Therapy, College of Pharmacy and Health Sciences, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI, United States.

Department of Medicine, University Health Center, Wayne State University, United States.

出版信息

Neurosci Lett. 2018 Sep 14;683:144-149. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2018.07.034. Epub 2018 Jul 25.

Abstract

Asymmetries in grasp force matching extend beyond quantifying a single measure of maximum grip strength and advance our application of side-specific treatment interventions. A cross sectional study design investigated grasp-force matching performance in right-handed individuals with a stroke and age-matched healthy controls. A visual representation of the 20% Maximum Voluntary Contraction (MVC) was matched in three conditions in the absence of visual feedback with the same (Ipsilateral Remembered - IR) or opposite hand (Concurrent - CC and Contralateral Remembered - CR). Greater overall relative error (RE) was found in contralateral compared to ipsilateral matching tasks. In the CR condition, post hoc analysis revealed significant differences between control and right hemisphere damage (RHD) group (95% CI [16.41-88.59]; p < 0.01) as well as left hemisphere damage (LHD) group and RHD (95% CI [23.4-95.09]; p < 0.01). Right hand matching relative error was 2.49 times larger in the RHD compared to the LHD group. Within the RHD group, matching errors were greater for the right than left hand in both contralateral conditions (95% CI [34.25-101.07]; p < 0.001). Individuals with RHD showed greater asymmetries in contralateral matching tasks compared to LHD and controls. More specifically, the RHD group had the greatest difficulty matching tasks with their right (non-paretic) than left (paretic) hand. In order to elucidate this asymmetry in the clinic the use of complementary grasp measures may be considered.

摘要

抓握力匹配中的不对称性不仅限于对最大握力这一单指标的量化,还推动了我们对特定侧别治疗干预措施的应用。一项横断面研究设计调查了右利手中风患者和年龄匹配的健康对照者的抓握力匹配表现。在无视觉反馈的三种情况下,将20%最大自主收缩(MVC)的视觉呈现与同一只手(同侧记忆 - IR)或对侧手(同时 - CC和对侧记忆 - CR)进行匹配。与同侧匹配任务相比,对侧匹配任务中发现的总体相对误差(RE)更大。在CR条件下,事后分析显示对照组与右半球损伤(RHD)组之间存在显著差异(95% CI [16.41 - 88.59];p < 0.01),以及左半球损伤(LHD)组与RHD组之间存在显著差异(95% CI [23.4 - 95.09];p < 0.01)。与LHD组相比,RHD组右手匹配相对误差大2.49倍。在RHD组内,在两种对侧条件下,右手的匹配误差均大于左手(95% CI [34.25 - 101.07];p < 0.001)。与LHD组和对照组相比,RHD个体在对侧匹配任务中表现出更大的不对称性。更具体地说,RHD组在使用右手(非瘫痪侧)而非左手(瘫痪侧)进行匹配任务时困难最大。为了在临床上阐明这种不对称性,可考虑使用补充抓握测量方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验