Suppr超能文献

旋律语调治疗对脑卒中后非流畅性失语症的随机初步试验。

Melodic intonation therapy in post-stroke nonfluent aphasia: a randomized pilot trial.

机构信息

1 PhD Program, School of Medicine, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

2 Department of Neurology and Stroke Center, La Paz University Hospital, IdiPAZ Health Research Institute, Autonomous University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.

出版信息

Clin Rehabil. 2019 Jan;33(1):44-53. doi: 10.1177/0269215518791004. Epub 2018 Jul 30.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

: To collect data to estimate the sample size of a definitive randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of Melodic Intonation Therapy in post-stroke nonfluent aphasia.

DESIGN

: A randomized, crossover, interventional pilot trial.

SETTING

: Departments of Neurology and Rehabilitation from a university general hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

: Stroke survivors with post-stroke nonfluent aphasia.

INTERVENTIONS

: Patients randomized to group 1 had treatment with Melodic Intonation Therapy first (12 sessions over six weeks) followed by no treatment; the patients in group 2 started active treatment between three and six months after their inclusion in the study, serving as waiting list controls for the first phase.

MAIN MEASURES

: The Communicative Activity Log (CAL) questionnaire and the Boston Diagnostic Aphasia Examination (BDAE) were evaluated at baseline, and at six and 12 weeks.

RESULTS

: Twenty patients were included. Four of the patients allocated to group 2 crossed over to group 1, receiving the treatment at first. Intention-to-treat analysis: after adjustment for baseline scores, the mean difference in the CAL evaluation from baseline in the treated group was 8.5 points (95% confidence interval (CI), 0.11-17.0; P = .043), with no significant change in any of the BDAE sections. Per-protocol analysis showed similar results with a clear treatment effect ( P = .043) on the CAL.

CONCLUSION

: Melodic Intonation Therapy might have a positive effect on the communication skills of stroke survivors with nonfluent aphasia as measured by the CAL questionnaire. A full-scale trial with at least 27 patients per group is necessary to confirm these results.

摘要

目的

收集数据以估计一项确定性随机对照试验的样本量,以评估旋律语调治疗对中风后非流利性失语症的影响。

设计

随机、交叉、干预性试验。

地点

一所大学综合医院的神经内科和康复科。

参与者

中风后非流利性失语症的幸存者。

干预措施

随机分配到第 1 组的患者首先接受旋律语调治疗(6 周内共 12 次),然后不进行治疗;第 2 组的患者在纳入研究后 3 至 6 个月开始进行积极治疗,作为第一阶段的候补对照组。

主要观察指标

在基线时以及 6 周和 12 周时,使用交流活动日志(CAL)问卷和波士顿诊断性失语症检查(BDAE)进行评估。

结果

共纳入 20 例患者。有 4 例被分配到第 2 组的患者交叉到第 1 组,首先接受治疗。意向性治疗分析:调整基线评分后,治疗组的 CAL 评估从基线的平均差值为 8.5 分(95%置信区间(CI),0.11-17.0;P=0.043),BDAE 各部分均无显著变化。基于方案的分析显示了类似的结果,CAL 有明确的治疗效果(P=0.043)。

结论

旋律语调治疗可能对中风后非流利性失语症患者的沟通技能产生积极影响,可通过 CAL 问卷进行测量。需要至少每组 27 例患者的大规模试验来证实这些结果。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验