University of Utah Department of Orthopaedics, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire.
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2019 Mar 1;44(5):369-376. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000002822.
Analysis of National Inpatient Sample (NIS), 2004 to 2015.
Describe recent trends in US rates of lumbar fusion procedures and associated costs, by surgical indication.
Spinal fusion is appropriate for spinal deformity and instability, but evidence of effectiveness is limited for primary disc herniation and spinal stenosis without instability. It remains controversial for treatment of axial pain secondary to degenerative disc disease. There are potential non-instability, non-deformity indications for fusion surgery, including but not limited to severe foraminal stenosis and third-time disc herniation.
Elective lumber fusion trends were reported using Poisson regression, grouped by indication as degenerative scoliosis, degenerative spondylolisthesis, spinal stenosis, disc herniation, and disc degeneration. Generalize linear regression was used to estimate trends in hospital costs, adjusted for age, sex, indication, comorbidity, and inflation.
Volume of elective lumbar fusion increased 62.3% (or 32.1% per 100,000 US adults), from 122,679 cases (60.4 per 100,000) in 2004 to 199,140 (79.8 per 100,000) in 2015. Increases were greatest among age 65 or older, increasing 138.7% by volume (73.2% by rate), from 98.3 per 100,000 (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.2, 99.3) in 2004 to 170.3 (95% CI 169.2, 171.5) in 2015. Although the largest increases were for spondylolisthesis (+47,390 operations, 111%) and scoliosis (+16,129 operations, 186.6%), disc degeneration, herniation, and stenosis combined to accounted for 42.3% of total elective lumbar fusions in 2015. Aggregate hospital costs increased 177% during these 12 years, exceeding $10 billion in 2015, and averaging more than $50,000 per admission.
While the prevalence of spinal pathologies is not known, the rate of elective lumbar fusion surgery in the United States increased most for spondylolisthesis and scoliosis, indications with relatively good evidence of effectiveness. The proportion of fusions coded for indications with less evidence of effectiveness has slightly decreased in the most recent years.
对 2004 年至 2015 年国家住院患者样本(NIS)进行分析。
描述按手术指征分类的美国腰椎融合术比例及相关费用的近期趋势。
脊柱融合术适用于脊柱畸形和不稳定,但对于原发性椎间盘突出症和无不稳定的脊柱狭窄,其有效性证据有限。对于继发于退行性椎间盘疾病的轴性疼痛的治疗,仍存在争议。对于融合手术存在潜在的非稳定性、非畸形适应证,包括但不限于严重椎间孔狭窄和第三次椎间盘突出。
采用泊松回归报告择期腰椎融合术趋势,按退行性脊柱侧凸、退行性脊椎滑脱、脊柱狭窄、椎间盘突出症和椎间盘退变等指征分组。采用广义线性回归估计医院费用趋势,按年龄、性别、指征、合并症和通货膨胀进行调整。
择期腰椎融合术的数量增加了 62.3%(每 10 万美国成年人增加 32.1%),从 2004 年的 122679 例(每 10 万 60.4 例)增加到 2015 年的 199140 例(每 10 万 79.8 例)。65 岁及以上患者的增幅最大,体积增加了 138.7%(比率增加了 73.2%),从 2004 年的每 10 万 98.3 例(95%置信区间[CI] 97.2,99.3)增加到 2015 年的每 10 万 170.3 例(95% CI 169.2,171.5)。虽然脊椎滑脱术(增加 47390 例手术,增加 111%)和脊柱侧凸术(增加 16129 例手术,增加 186.6%)的增幅最大,但椎间盘退变、突出和狭窄加起来占 2015 年所有择期腰椎融合术的 42.3%。在这 12 年期间,医院总费用增加了 177%,2015 年超过 100 亿美元,平均每次住院费用超过 5 万美元。
尽管脊柱病变的流行程度尚不清楚,但美国择期腰椎融合术的比例在美国脊椎滑脱和脊柱侧凸患者中增加最多,这两个指征的有效性证据相对较好。最近几年,编码为疗效证据较少的适应证的融合术比例略有下降。
3 级。