Suppr超能文献

一项针对成人噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增生症的前瞻性质量改进计划,旨在改善检测,并通过回顾性分析建立一个有助于触发因素识别和减轻出血的框架。

A prospective quality improvement initiative in adult hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis to improve testing and a framework to facilitate trigger identification and mitigate hemorrhage from retrospective analysis.

作者信息

Merrill Samuel A, Naik Rakhi, Streiff Michael B, Shanbhag Satish, Lanzkron Sophie, Braunstein Evan M, Moliterno Alison M, Brodsky Robert A

机构信息

Division of Hematology, Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2018 Aug;97(31):e11579. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000011579.

Abstract

Hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH) is a highly fatal, hyperinflammatory syndrome in adults triggered by an underlying illness in most cases. As such, suspicion of HLH dictates further investigation to identify the HLH trigger and determine treatment. HLH is clinically challenging due to diverse presentations and underlying triggers, provider unfamiliarity, and bleeding complications. Clinically, we observed diagnostic error from incorrect testing and cognitive biases (interleukin-2 confused with soluble interleukin-2 receptor and natural killer cell quantification confused with functional assays).This study reports our single institutional experience with adult HLH with the aim to reduce erroneous testing with a quality improvement (QI) project, and to facilitate trigger discovery and mitigate hemorrhage. Provider education on HLH testing was the prospective intervention, followed by mistaken test removal. HLH triggers and diagnostic utility were determined by retrospective chart review. Risk factors for hemorrhage were determined by multivariable analysis.Erroneous HLH testing was reduced from 74% to 24% of patients (P < .001) by the QI intervention. These changes were projected to save $11,700 yearly. The majority (64%) of patients evaluated for HLH were on non-hematology/oncology services, highlighting the need for vigilance in hematology consultation. Sixty-three patients met classic HLH-2004 criteria for HLH. Malignancy (38%), infection (27%), Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) (14%), or autoimmune disease (8%) triggered most HLH cases. HLH triggers were most commonly identified by serologic testing (27%) and bone marrow biopsy (19%). Biopsy of other affected organs based on PET-CT imaging after unsuccessful initial diagnostic measures was helpful, and focal fluorodeoxyglucose uptake was predictive of an underlying malignancy (likelihood ratio 8.3, P = .004). Major hemorrhage occurred in 41% of patients. On multivariable analysis the odds ratios (OR) for major hemorrhage were increased for patients with intensive care unit level care (OR 10.47, P = .005), and disseminated intravascular coagulation in the first week of admission (OR 10.53, P = .04).These data are incorporated into a framework to encourage early HLH recognition with the HScore, facilitate trigger identification, identify those at risk for hemorrhage, and minimize low-yield or erroneous testing.

摘要

噬血细胞性淋巴组织细胞增生症(HLH)是一种在成人中高度致命的高炎症综合征,多数情况下由潜在疾病引发。因此,怀疑患有HLH需要进一步检查以确定HLH的触发因素并决定治疗方案。由于临床表现多样、潜在触发因素不同、医生不熟悉以及出血并发症等原因,HLH在临床上具有挑战性。临床上,我们观察到因检测错误和认知偏差(白细胞介素-2与可溶性白细胞介素-2受体混淆,自然杀伤细胞定量与功能测定混淆)导致的诊断错误。本研究报告了我们单机构对成人HLH的经验,旨在通过质量改进(QI)项目减少错误检测,并促进触发因素的发现和减轻出血。对医生进行HLH检测教育是前瞻性干预措施,随后去除错误检测项目。通过回顾性病历审查确定HLH的触发因素和诊断效用。通过多变量分析确定出血的危险因素。通过QI干预,错误的HLH检测从74%降至24%的患者(P<0.001)。这些变化预计每年节省11,700美元。接受HLH评估的大多数患者(64%)在非血液学/肿瘤学科室,这突出了血液学会诊时保持警惕的必要性。63例患者符合HLH-2004经典HLH标准。恶性肿瘤(38%)、感染(27%)、 Epstein-Barr病毒(EBV)(14%)或自身免疫性疾病(8%)引发了大多数HLH病例。HLH触发因素最常通过血清学检测(27%)和骨髓活检(19%)确定。在初始诊断措施未成功后,根据PET-CT成像对其他受影响器官进行活检很有帮助,局部氟脱氧葡萄糖摄取可预测潜在恶性肿瘤(似然比8.3,P = 0.004)。41%的患者发生了大出血。多变量分析显示,入住重症监护病房(OR 10.47,P = 0.005)和入院第一周发生弥散性血管内凝血(OR 10.53,P = 0.04)的患者大出血的优势比增加。这些数据被纳入一个框架,以鼓励通过HScore早期识别HLH,促进触发因素的识别,识别出血风险患者,并尽量减少低收益或错误检测。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9710/6081085/704d333f971d/medi-97-e11579-g003.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验