Suppr超能文献

评估过敏反应的严重程度:23种工具的数据驱动比较

Assessing severity of anaphylaxis: a data-driven comparison of 23 instruments.

作者信息

Eller Esben, Muraro Antonella, Dahl Ronald, Mortz Charlotte Gotthard, Bindslev-Jensen Carsten

机构信息

1Odense Research Center for Anaphylaxis (ORCA), Department of Dermatology and Allergy Center, Odense University Hospital, Odense, Denmark.

2Food Allergy Referral Centre - Veneto Region, Department of Women and Child Health, Padua University Hospital, Padua, Italy.

出版信息

Clin Transl Allergy. 2018 Aug 1;8:29. doi: 10.1186/s13601-018-0215-x. eCollection 2018.

Abstract

BACKGROUD

The severity of an allergic reaction can range from mild local symptoms to anaphylactic shock. To score this, a number of instruments have been developed, although heterogeneous in design and purpose. Severity scoring algorithms are therefore difficult to compare, but are frequently used beyond their initial purpose. Our objective was to compare the most used severity scoring instruments by a data-driven approach on both milder reactions and anaphylaxis.

METHODS

All positive challenges to foods or drugs (n = 2828) including anaphylaxis (n = 616) at Odense University Hospital, Denmark from 1998 to 2016 were included and severity was scored according to Sampson5. Based on recommendations from an expert group, the symptoms and values from Sampson5 were for all reactions and anaphylaxis only translated and compared by kappa statistics with 22 instruments, ranging from 3 to 6 steps.

RESULTS

For milder reactions, there was a significant correlation between the number of steps in an instrument and the number of challenges that could be translated, whereas all instruments were good to identify food anaphylaxis. Some instruments scored reactions more severely than Sampson5, other scored them milder and some scored food and drug challenges differently. Instruments for hymenoptera reactions were difficult to apply on food and drug reactions, and thus distributed severity differently. Algorithms hampered the translation between instruments, and 7 instruments were poor concerning drug anaphylaxis, including the only instrument developed specifically for drug reactions.

CONCLUSION

The distributions of severity differed between the 23 instruments in both food and drug allergy, and thus rendering translation especially between scoring systems with 3 and 5 grades difficult. Fine-graded and simple instruments are preferred for comparison especially among milder reactions, and instruments applied to non-intended situations may not reflect a true severity picture.

摘要

背景

过敏反应的严重程度可从轻微的局部症状到过敏性休克。为了对此进行评分,已经开发了许多工具,尽管其设计和用途各不相同。因此,严重程度评分算法难以比较,但它们经常被用于其最初目的之外。我们的目标是通过数据驱动的方法,比较在较轻反应和过敏反应中最常用的严重程度评分工具。

方法

纳入了丹麦欧登塞大学医院1998年至2016年期间所有食物或药物激发试验阳性(n = 2828),包括过敏反应(n = 616),并根据桑普森评分系统进行严重程度评分。根据一个专家组的建议,桑普森评分系统中的症状和数值仅针对所有反应和过敏反应进行翻译,并通过kappa统计与22种工具进行比较,这些工具分为3至6个等级。

结果

对于较轻的反应,一种工具的等级数量与可翻译的激发试验数量之间存在显著相关性,而所有工具在识别食物过敏反应方面都表现良好。一些工具对反应的评分比桑普森评分系统更严重,另一些则更轻,还有一些对食物和药物激发试验的评分不同。用于膜翅目昆虫叮咬反应的工具难以应用于食物和药物反应,因此严重程度分布不同。算法阻碍了工具之间的转换,7种工具在药物过敏反应方面表现不佳,包括唯一专门为药物反应开发的工具。

结论

在食物和药物过敏中,23种工具的严重程度分布不同,因此使得特别是在3级和5级评分系统之间的转换变得困难。对于比较,尤其是在较轻反应之间,更倾向于使用分级精细且简单的工具,而应用于非预期情况的工具可能无法反映真实的严重程度情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/02db/6069559/0ee0eb0efad7/13601_2018_215_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验