1 Sorbonne Université, Inserm, Unité "Réhabilitation chirurgicale mini-invasive et robotisée de l'audition," Paris, France.
2 AP-HP, GHU Pitié-Salpêtrière, Service ORL, Otologie, implants auditifs et chirurgie de la base du crâne, Paris, France.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2018 Nov;159(5):900-907. doi: 10.1177/0194599818792232. Epub 2018 Aug 7.
To compare the intracochlear trauma induced by optimized robot-based and manual techniques with a straight electrode array prototype inserted at different lengths.
Experimental study.
Robot-based otologic surgery laboratory.
A prototype array was inserted at different insertion lengths (21 and 25 mm) in 20 temporal bones. The manual insertion was performed with a microforceps. The optimized approach consisted of an optimal axis insertion provided by a robot-based arm controlled by a tracking system, with a constant speed of insertion (0.25 mm/s) achieved by a motorized insertion tool. The electrode position was determined at the level of each electrode by stereomicroscopic cochlea section analysis.
A higher number of electrodes correctly located in the scala tympani was associated with the optimized approach ( P = .03, 2-way analysis of variance). Regardless of the insertion technique used, the array inserted at 25 mm allowed complete insertion of the active stimulating portion of the array in all cases. Insertion depth was greater when the array was inserted to 25 mm versus 21 mm ( P < .001, 2-way analysis of variance). The optimized insertion was associated with less trauma than that from manual insertion regardless the length of the inserted array ( P = .04, 2-way analysis of variance).
Compared with a manual insertion, intracochlear trauma could be reduced with array insertion performed on an optimal axis by using motorized insertion and by applying a constant insertion speed.
比较优化的机器人辅助和手动技术与直电极阵列原型插入不同长度时对内耳的创伤。
实验研究。
基于机器人的耳科学手术实验室。
将原型阵列以不同的插入长度(21 和 25 mm)插入 20 个颞骨中。手动插入使用微夹进行。优化方法包括由跟踪系统控制的机器人臂提供的优化插入轴,通过电动插入工具实现插入速度(0.25 mm/s)恒定。通过立体显微镜耳蜗切片分析确定每个电极的电极位置。
更多数量的电极正确位于鼓室阶与优化方法相关(P =.03,2 因素方差分析)。无论使用哪种插入技术,插入 25 mm 的阵列都允许在所有情况下完全插入阵列的主动刺激部分。与插入 21 mm 相比,插入 25 mm 时插入深度更大(P <.001,2 因素方差分析)。无论插入的阵列长度如何,与手动插入相比,优化插入与较少的创伤相关(P =.04,2 因素方差分析)。
与手动插入相比,通过使用电动插入和施加恒定插入速度在优化轴上进行阵列插入,可以减少内耳创伤。