Giordano Peter J, Taylor J Eason, Branthwaite Hannah E
Department of Psychological Science, Belmont University, Nashville, TN, USA.
Integr Psychol Behav Sci. 2018 Dec;52(4):686-693. doi: 10.1007/s12124-018-9455-5.
In two commentaries, Kostromina and Grishina (2018) and Mironenko (2018) offered constructive thoughts and questions in response to an article by Giordano (2018, Culture & Psychology, 23, 502-518) on the merits of an approach to understanding individual personality that focuses on the processes rather than structures of personality. In this reply, the authors seek to clarify some of the points made in the original article. The authors also describe a personality process-structure duality, whereby personality is conceptualized in terms of processes or structures based on the methods used to study it. If the goal is to understand the dynamic and emergent properties of individual personality, the authors continue to argue for the merits of a process-centric approach and the avoidance of structural thinking.
在两篇评论文章中,科斯捷罗马娜和格里希娜(2018年)以及米罗年科(2018年)针对乔达诺(2018年,《文化与心理学》,第23卷,第502 - 518页)一篇关于理解个体人格的方法的文章提出了建设性的想法和问题,该方法侧重于人格的过程而非结构。在这篇回应文章中,作者们试图澄清原文章中提出的一些观点。作者们还描述了一种人格过程 - 结构二元性,即根据用于研究人格的方法,将人格概念化为基于过程或结构的。如果目标是理解个体人格的动态和涌现特性,作者们继续主张以过程为中心的方法的优点以及避免结构思维。