School of Pharmacy, Northeastern University, Boston, MA.
Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA.
Crit Care Med. 2018 Sep;46(9):e825-e873. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000003299.
To update and expand the 2013 Clinical Practice Guidelines for the Management of Pain, Agitation, and Delirium in Adult Patients in the ICU.
Thirty-two international experts, four methodologists, and four critical illness survivors met virtually at least monthly. All section groups gathered face-to-face at annual Society of Critical Care Medicine congresses; virtual connections included those unable to attend. A formal conflict of interest policy was developed a priori and enforced throughout the process. Teleconferences and electronic discussions among subgroups and whole panel were part of the guidelines' development. A general content review was completed face-to-face by all panel members in January 2017.
Content experts, methodologists, and ICU survivors were represented in each of the five sections of the guidelines: Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption). Each section created Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome, and nonactionable, descriptive questions based on perceived clinical relevance. The guideline group then voted their ranking, and patients prioritized their importance. For each Population, Intervention, Comparison, and Outcome question, sections searched the best available evidence, determined its quality, and formulated recommendations as "strong," "conditional," or "good" practice statements based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation principles. In addition, evidence gaps and clinical caveats were explicitly identified.
The Pain, Agitation/Sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) panel issued 37 recommendations (three strong and 34 conditional), two good practice statements, and 32 ungraded, nonactionable statements. Three questions from the patient-centered prioritized question list remained without recommendation.
We found substantial agreement among a large, interdisciplinary cohort of international experts regarding evidence supporting recommendations, and the remaining literature gaps in the assessment, prevention, and treatment of Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) in critically ill adults. Highlighting this evidence and the research needs will improve Pain, Agitation/sedation, Delirium, Immobility (mobilization/rehabilitation), and Sleep (disruption) management and provide the foundation for improved outcomes and science in this vulnerable population.
更新和扩展 2013 年成人 ICU 疼痛、躁动和谵妄管理临床实践指南。
32 名国际专家、4 名方法学家和 4 名危重病幸存者至少每月在线举行一次会议。所有分组都在重症监护医学会年会上面对面聚集;虚拟联系包括那些无法参加的人。预先制定了一项正式的利益冲突政策,并在整个过程中执行。电话会议和电子讨论在小组和全体小组成员之间进行,是指南制定的一部分。2017 年 1 月,全体小组成员面对面完成了对指南的全面内容审查。
在指南的五个部分,即疼痛、躁动/镇静、谵妄、活动受限(动员/康复)和睡眠(障碍)中,均有内容专家、方法学家和 ICU 幸存者参与。每个部分根据感知的临床相关性,创建了人群、干预、比较和结局,以及非行动性描述性问题。然后,指南小组对他们的排名进行投票,患者对其重要性进行了优先排序。对于每个人群、干预、比较和结局问题,各部分均搜索最佳可用证据,确定其质量,并根据推荐评估、制定和评估原则,将建议制定为“强”、“有条件”或“良好”的实践陈述。此外,还明确确定了证据差距和临床注意事项。
疼痛、躁动/镇静、谵妄、活动受限(动员/康复)和睡眠(障碍)小组发布了 37 项建议(三项强推荐和 34 项有条件推荐)、两项良好实践陈述和 32 项非分级、非行动性陈述。患者为中心的优先问题清单中有三个问题仍未得到建议。
我们发现,在对评估、预防和治疗成人危重病患者疼痛、躁动/镇静、谵妄、活动受限(动员/康复)和睡眠(障碍)的支持建议的证据方面,一个由大量跨学科国际专家组成的大型队列之间存在实质性共识,以及在该领域的文献仍存在差距。突出这一证据和研究需求将改善疼痛、躁动/镇静、谵妄、活动受限(动员/康复)和睡眠(障碍)的管理,并为这一脆弱人群的改善结果和科学提供基础。