Rifcon GmbH, Hirschberg, Germany.
Crop Science Division, Bayer AG, Monheim, Germany.
Integr Environ Assess Manag. 2019 Jan;15(1):29-39. doi: 10.1002/ieam.4092. Epub 2018 Oct 22.
Risk assessments for plant protection products and their active ingredients that are based on standard laboratory tests performed under constant exposure conditions may result in an overestimation of risks because exposure in the environment is often characterized by a few short peaks. Here, the General Unified Threshold Model of Survival (GUTS) was used to conduct a refined risk assessment for the herbicide tembotrione and its effects on the marine invertebrate Americamysis bahia, for which the standard chronic effect assessment failed. The GUTS model was first calibrated with time-to-effect and concentration-response data from 2 independent acute experiments with A. bahia. Model parameters for both toxicodynamic assumptions of stochastic death (SD) and individual tolerance (IT) were estimated with the reduced GUTS model (GUTS-RED) using the scaled internal concentration as a dose metric. Both the calibrated GUTS-RED-SD and GUTS-RED-IT models described survival dynamics well. Model validation using datasets of 2 independent chronic tests yielded robust predictions of long-term toxicity of tembotrione on A. bahia, with GUTS-RED-IT being more reliable than GUTS-RED-SD. The validated model was subsequently used to predict survival from time-variable exposure profiles, as derived from the FOrum for Co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their USe (FOCUS). Because ecotoxicological independence of peaks had not been empirically verified, the link between exposure and effects was assessed with complete exposure profiles. Effect thresholds resulting from different peak exposure concentrations and durations were determined with GUTS and directly compared with the exposure concentrations from the FOCUS surface water scenarios. The derived values were higher than the predicted FOCUS critical concentrations. Additionally, comparing the areas under the curve (AUCs) derived with GUTS for multiple peak exposure profiles to those from FOCUS revealed significant additional safety margins, demonstrating that only unrealistically high exposure concentrations would produce significant effects. In conclusion, no unacceptable effects of tembotrione on aquatic invertebrates under realistic environmental exposure conditions are expected. Integr Environ Assess Manag 2019;15:29-39. © 2018 SETAC.
基于在恒定暴露条件下进行的标准实验室测试对植物保护产品及其有效成分进行的风险评估可能会导致风险被高估,因为环境中的暴露通常具有几个短暂的高峰。在这里,使用通用统一生存阈值模型(GUTS)对除草剂涕灭威及其对海洋无脊椎动物美洲真虾的影响进行了精细的风险评估,而标准慢性效应评估未能对其进行评估。GUTS 模型首先使用来自 2 个独立的急性 A. bahia 实验的时间效应和浓度-反应数据进行校准。使用作为剂量指标的缩放内部浓度,使用简化的 GUTS 模型(GUTS-RED)估算了随机死亡(SD)和个体耐受(IT)这两种毒理学假设的模型参数。校准后的 GUTS-RED-SD 和 GUTS-RED-IT 模型均很好地描述了生存动态。使用 2 个独立的慢性测试数据集进行模型验证,对涕灭威对 A. bahia 的长期毒性进行了可靠的预测,其中 GUTS-RED-IT 比 GUTS-RED-SD 更可靠。随后,使用从 FOrum for Co-ordination of pesticide fate models and their USe(FOCUS)导出的时变暴露曲线来预测生存情况。由于没有经验验证过峰之间的生态毒理学独立性,因此通过完整的暴露曲线评估暴露与效应之间的关系。使用 GUTS 确定不同峰暴露浓度和持续时间产生的效应阈值,并直接将其与 FOCUS 地表水情景中的暴露浓度进行比较。得出的值高于预测的 FOCUS 关键浓度。此外,将 GUTS 为多个峰暴露曲线推导的曲线下面积(AUC)与 FOCUS 的 AUC 进行比较,发现存在显著的附加安全裕度,这表明只有不切实际的高暴露浓度才会产生显著影响。总之,在现实的环境暴露条件下,预计涕灭威对水生无脊椎动物不会产生不可接受的影响。综合环境评估与管理 2019;15:29-39。©2018 SETAC。