Lamont Scott, Stewart Cameron, Chiarella Mary
J Law Med. 2016;24(2):371-86.
Decision-making capacity has been researched from within the disciplines of bioethics, medicine and law. The field of capacity assessment is dominated by tension between the principles of autonomy (self-determination) and beneficence (protection). Further, decision-making capacity is argued to be the central component of a legally valid consent. This article discusses the relevant ethical, legal and professional responsibilities relating to decision-making capacity and consent to treatment within health care. It begins with an overview of the ethical principles underpinning decision-making capacity and consent, and follows with a legal analysis of these concepts, focusing on the common law of trespass and negligence. The article then explores the concepts of best interests and necessity, which underpin the treatment of incapacitated persons, before concluding with an examination of treatment refusal and legislation relating to decision-making capacity and consent to treatment.
决策能力已在生物伦理学、医学和法学等学科领域得到研究。能力评估领域主要存在自主权(自决权)原则与行善原则(保护原则)之间的紧张关系。此外,决策能力被认为是具有法律效力的同意的核心要素。本文讨论了医疗保健领域中与决策能力及治疗同意相关的伦理、法律和专业责任。文章首先概述了支撑决策能力和同意的伦理原则,接着对这些概念进行法律分析,重点关注侵权法和过失法的普通法。然后探讨了支撑无行为能力者治疗的最佳利益和必要性概念,最后审查了治疗拒绝以及与决策能力和治疗同意相关的立法。