Suppr超能文献

在女性慢性肾病风险预测中,中心主动脉收缩压相较于肱动脉血压测量具有优势。

Central Aortic Systolic Blood Pressure Exhibits Advantages Over Brachial Blood Pressure Measurements in Chronic Kidney Disease Risk Prediction in Women.

作者信息

Zhang Linfeng, Wang Zhengwu, Chen Zuo, Wang Xin, Tian Ye, Shao Lan, Zhu Manlu

出版信息

Kidney Blood Press Res. 2018;43(4):1375-1387. doi: 10.1159/000492952. Epub 2018 Aug 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate whether the invasively obtained central aortic systolic blood pressure (CSBP) predicts chronic kidney disease (CKD) better than brachial systolic blood pressure (SBP), brachial diastolic blood pressure (DBP) and brachial pulse pressure (PP) in the middle-aged Chinese population.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was carried out across China in 2009-2010 among the subjects aged 35-64 years. CSBP was measured non-invasively by radial artery applanation tonometry B-pro (A-PULSE CASP and corresponding software). CSBP, SBP, DBP and PP were standardized with Z-score and the odds ratios were calculated with multivariable logistic regression model.

RESULTS

Data of 10197 participants were analyzed. The multivariable logistic regression after adjusting for possible confounders showed that a 1-standard deviation increment in each blood pressure measurement was associated with greater risk of CKD in both men and women (P < 0.05). The association of CSBP with CKD was stronger than SBP, DBP and PP in women, while in men the association of CSBP with CKD was stronger only than PP. With CSBP and SBP entering into the multivariable logistic regression models jointly, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for CSBP and SBP was 1.57 (1.39-1.79) and 1.22 (1.07-1.38) in women and 1.20 (1.03-1.39) and 1.48 (1.28-1.72) in men, respectively. With CSBP and DBP entering into the multivariable logistic regression models jointly, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for CSBP and DBP was 1.68 (1.52-1.84) and 1.15 (1.04-1.27) in women and 1.30 (1.15-1.46) and 1.45 (1.29-1.63) in men, respectively. With CSBP and PP entering into the multivariable logistic regression models jointly, the odds ratio (95% confidence interval) for CSBP and PP was 1.75 (1.58-1.94) and 1.06 (0.96-1.17) in women and 1.58 (1.41-1.77) and 1.04 (0.93-1.17) in men, respectively.

CONCLUSION

CSBP and brachial blood pressure measurements are all predictors of CKD, however the non-invasively obtained CSBP may offer advantages over brachial blood pressure measurements in CKD risk prediction in women.

摘要

背景/目的:研究在中国中年人群中,通过有创方式获得的中心主动脉收缩压(CSBP)在预测慢性肾脏病(CKD)方面是否优于肱动脉收缩压(SBP)、肱动脉舒张压(DBP)和肱动脉脉压(PP)。

方法

2009年至2010年在中国各地开展了一项针对35至64岁受试者的横断面研究。采用桡动脉压平式张力测定仪B-pro(A-PULSE CASP及相应软件)无创测量CSBP。将CSBP、SBP、DBP和PP用Z分数标准化,并使用多变量逻辑回归模型计算比值比。

结果

对10197名参与者的数据进行了分析。在调整可能的混杂因素后进行的多变量逻辑回归显示,每种血压测量值增加1个标准差与男性和女性患CKD的风险增加相关(P<0.05)。在女性中,CSBP与CKD的关联比SBP、DBP和PP更强,而在男性中,CSBP与CKD的关联仅比PP更强。当CSBP和SBP共同进入多变量逻辑回归模型时,女性中CSBP和SBP的比值比(95%置信区间)分别为1.57(1.39-1.79)和1.22(1.07-1.38),男性中分别为1.20(1.03-1.39)和1.48(1.28-1.72)。当CSBP和DBP共同进入多变量逻辑回归模型时,女性中CSBP和DBP的比值比(95%置信区间)分别为1.68(1.52-1.84)和1.15(1.04-1.27),男性中分别为1.30(1.15-1.46)和1.45(1.29-1.63)。当CSBP和PP共同进入多变量逻辑回归模型时,女性中CSBP和PP的比值比(95%置信区间)分别为1.75(1.58-1.94)和1.06(0.96-1.17),男性中分别为1.58(1.41-1.77)和1.04(0.93-1.17)。

结论

CSBP和肱动脉血压测量值均为CKD的预测指标,然而,在预测女性CKD风险方面,无创获得的CSBP可能比肱动脉血压测量值更具优势。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验