Suppr超能文献

症状性自发性孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层的治疗策略和结局:系统评价和荟萃分析。

Treatment Strategies and Outcomes of Symptomatic Spontaneous Isolated Superior Mesenteric Artery Dissection: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

机构信息

1 Department of General Surgery & Vascular Surgery, Chinese PLA General Hospital Hainan Branch, Sanya, China.

2 Department of Radiology, Chinese PLA the 309th Hospital, Beijing, China.

出版信息

J Endovasc Ther. 2018 Oct;25(5):640-648. doi: 10.1177/1526602818796537. Epub 2018 Aug 29.

Abstract

PURPOSE

To analyze the published treatment experience with symptomatic spontaneous isolated superior mesenteric artery dissection (SISMAD).

METHODS

A literature search of the PubMed and Cochrane databases was conducted for articles on symptomatic SISMAD published in English from January 2007 to January 2018. Case series reporting on both treatment modalities and outcomes were included, while those on traumatic or iatrogenic SMA dissection or SMA dissection accompanied by aortic or other visceral artery dissection were excluded. Overall event rates for treated symptomatic SISMAD were calculated using pooled analyses. The rate of initial conservative treatment, the success rate, the rate of conversion to intervention, and the failure rate in patients with vs without antithrombotic therapy were calculated for each study and compared using a meta-analysis of proportions.

RESULTS

The 25 articles selected encompassed 616 SISMAD cases, of which 514 were symptomatic cases eligible for the analysis. Among the latter, initial treatment consisted of conservative therapy in 447 (87.0%) patients and surgical interventions in 67 (13.0%) patients [45 (8.7%) endovascular procedures and 22 (4.3%) open surgeries]. Among conservative cases, 238 (53.2%) received antithrombotic therapy while 172 (38.5%) did not; 50 (11.2%) cases were converted to intervention [42 (84%) endovascular]. Conservative treatment was initially used in 85.2% of pooled cases with an 84.7% success rate, a 14.3% rate of conversion to intervention, and conservative treatment failure rates of 17.8% and 10.1% in patients treated with vs without antithrombotic therapy, respectively (p=0.103).

CONCLUSION

Conservative treatment appeared safe and effective in >80% of symptomatic SISMAD cases, without apparent benefit for antithrombotic agent use. Initial or secondary intervention was more often endovascular, with favorable success rates and short-term outcomes. Large, prospective randomized trials with long-term follow-up are warranted on the treatment for symptomatic SISMAD.

摘要

目的

分析有症状自发性孤立性肠系膜上动脉夹层(SISMAD)的已发表治疗经验。

方法

对 2007 年 1 月至 2018 年 1 月期间以英文发表的有症状 SISMAD 的文章,在 PubMed 和 Cochrane 数据库中进行文献检索。纳入了报告治疗方式和结局的病例系列研究,而排除了创伤性或医源性 SMA 夹层或伴有主动脉或其他内脏动脉夹层的 SMA 夹层。使用汇总分析计算治疗后有症状 SISMAD 的总事件发生率。计算每个研究中初始保守治疗、成功率、转换为介入治疗的比例和无抗血栓治疗患者的失败率,并使用比例的荟萃分析进行比较。

结果

选择的 25 篇文章共纳入 616 例 SISMAD 病例,其中 514 例为符合分析条件的有症状病例。在后者中,初始治疗包括 447 例(87.0%)患者的保守治疗和 67 例(13.0%)患者的手术干预[45 例(8.7%)血管内治疗和 22 例(4.3%)开放手术]。在保守治疗病例中,238 例(53.2%)接受抗血栓治疗,172 例(38.5%)未接受抗血栓治疗;50 例(11.2%)病例转为介入治疗[42 例(84%)血管内治疗]。汇总病例中,85.2%的病例最初采用保守治疗,成功率为 84.7%,转化率为 14.3%,抗血栓治疗患者的保守治疗失败率为 17.8%,无抗血栓治疗患者的保守治疗失败率为 10.1%(p=0.103)。

结论

在>80%的有症状 SISMAD 病例中,保守治疗似乎是安全有效的,抗血栓药物的使用似乎没有明显获益。初始或继发性介入治疗更常采用血管内治疗,成功率和短期结局良好。有必要进行针对有症状 SISMAD 的治疗的大型、前瞻性随机试验,并进行长期随访。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验