Liu Ying, Zhang SuZhong, Chen Ruie, Wei Jieshu, Guan Guanheng, Zhou Manru, Dong Nan, Cao Yingnan
Allergy Asthma Proc. 2018 Sep 1;39(5):332-337. doi: 10.2500/aap.2018.39.4149.
Several studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab treatment with uncontrolled asthma. However, most of these studies were small and conclusions were inconsistent. Furthermore, whether serum periostin can act as a good predictor of the response to lebrikizumab treatment is still not certain.
We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials to evaluate the efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab treatment with uncontrolled asthma. Trials were searched in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane. Outcome measures were the rate of asthma exacerbations, relative changes in the forced expiratory volume in the first second of expiration (FEV1) of predicted value (%) and incidence of adverse events.
Five trials were finally included. Compared with placebo lebrikizumab treatment significantly decreased the rate of exacerbations(risk ratio [RR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval {CI}, 0.54-0.80]; p < 0.0001; n = 2039) and increased FEV1% of predicted value (weighted mean difference [WMD] 5.46 [95% CI, 2.48-8.43]; p < 0.0003; n = 351). Patients with high levels of serum periostin had greater exacerbation rate reductions (RR 0.59 [95%CI, 0.50-0.70]; p < 0.00001; n = 1157) and FEV1 of predicted value improvement (WMD 7.18 [95% CI, 2.93-11.42]; p < 0.0009; n = 177) than patients with low periostin levels in exacerbation rate reductions (RR 0.73 [95% CI, 0.47-1.14]; p < 0.17; n = 882) and FEV1 of predicted value improvement (WMD3.79 [95% CI, 0.39-7.97]; p < 0.08; n = 174). There was no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events in patients with lebrikizumab compared to placebo (RR 1.03 [95% CI, 0.99-1.06]; p < 0.11; n = 2056).
In patients with uncontrolled asthma, lebrikizumab treatment significantly decreased the rate of exacerbation and improved lung function, especially for patients with high periostin levels.
多项研究评估了瑞莎珠单抗治疗未控制哮喘的疗效和安全性。然而,这些研究大多规模较小,结论并不一致。此外,血清骨膜蛋白是否可作为瑞莎珠单抗治疗反应的良好预测指标仍不确定。
我们对随机对照试验进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以评估瑞莎珠单抗治疗未控制哮喘的疗效和安全性。在PubMed、Embase、科学网和考克兰系统评价数据库中检索试验。结局指标为哮喘急性加重率、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)占预计值百分比的相对变化以及不良事件发生率。
最终纳入5项试验。与安慰剂相比,瑞莎珠单抗治疗显著降低了急性加重率(风险比[RR]0.66[95%置信区间{CI},0.54 - 0.80];p < 0.0001;n = 2039),并提高了FEV1占预计值的百分比(加权均数差[WMD]5.46[95%CI,2.48 - 8.43];p < 0.0003;n = 351)。血清骨膜蛋白水平高的患者在降低急性加重率(RR 0.59[95%CI,0.50 - 0.70];p < 0.00001;n = 1157)和提高FEV1占预计值方面(WMD 7.18[95%CI,2.93 - 11.42];p < 0.0009;n = 177)比血清骨膜蛋白水平低的患者更明显,后者降低急性加重率(RR 0.73[95%CI,0.47 - 1.14];p < 0.17;n = 882)和提高FEV1占预计值方面(WMD3.79[95%CI,0.39 - 7.97];p < 0.08;n = 174)。与安慰剂相比,接受瑞莎珠单抗治疗的患者不良事件发生率无显著差异(RR 1.03[95%CI,0.99 - 1.06];p < 0.11;n = 2056)。
在未控制哮喘患者中,瑞莎珠单抗治疗显著降低了急性加重率并改善了肺功能,尤其是对骨膜蛋白水平高的患者。