Hwang Thomas J, Lauffenburger Julie C, Franklin Jessica M, Kesselheim Aaron S
Faculty of Arts and Sciences, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
Program on Regulation, Therapeutics, and Law (PORTAL), Division of Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacoeconomics, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016 Aug 29;1(5):301-308. doi: 10.1016/j.jacbts.2016.03.012. eCollection 2016 Aug.
Cardiovascular disease remains a leading cause of death, but stakeholders have recently raised concerns about the pace of innovation and investment in developing new therapeutics. Here, the authors characterized temporal trends in cardiovascular research and development over the past 2 decades and the likelihood of successful completion of pre-approval clinical trials. The authors also evaluated the reasons for discontinuation, novelty, and rates of trial results publication for cardiovascular therapies in late-stage development. Between 1990 and 2012, the number of new cardiovascular drugs entering clinical trials declined across all stages of development (p < 0.001 for linear trends). There was no evidence for a difference in probability of successful progression to the next stage of development between cardiovascular and noncardiovascular drugs. Small and medium-sized companies sponsored 43%, 38%, and 31% of new Phase 1, Phase 2, and Phase 3 trials, respectively. Roughly one-half of the drugs in Phase 3 trials were categorized as targeting a novel biological pathway. The number of cardiovascular trials sponsored by small and medium-sized companies and the number of novel drugs entering Phase 3 trials increased over time. Most drugs were discontinued in Phase 3 due to inadequate efficacy (44%) or safety issues (24%), but the Phase 3 trial results for only one-half of the discontinued drugs were published in peer-reviewed journals. These results shed light on important shifts in research and development activity and confirm the perceived challenges in cardiovascular translational research.
心血管疾病仍然是主要的死亡原因,但利益相关者最近对开发新疗法的创新步伐和投资表示担忧。在此,作者描述了过去20年心血管研究与开发的时间趋势以及批准前临床试验成功完成的可能性。作者还评估了后期开发中心血管疗法的停药原因、新颖性和试验结果发表率。1990年至2012年期间,进入临床试验的新型心血管药物数量在所有开发阶段均有所下降(线性趋势,p < 0.001)。没有证据表明心血管药物和非心血管药物进入下一开发阶段的成功概率存在差异。中小型公司分别赞助了43%、38%和31%的新的1期、2期和3期试验。3期试验中约一半的药物被归类为针对一种新的生物途径。随着时间的推移,由中小型公司赞助的心血管试验数量以及进入3期试验的新型药物数量有所增加。大多数药物在3期试验中因疗效不足(44%)或安全问题(24%)而停药,但只有一半停药药物的3期试验结果在同行评审期刊上发表。这些结果揭示了研发活动中的重要转变,并证实了心血管转化研究中存在的明显挑战。