1Department of Farm Animal Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Utrecht University,Yalelaan 7,3584CMUtrecht,The Netherlands.
2Department of Equine Sciences, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine,Utrecht University,Yalelaan 112,3584CMUtrecht,The Netherlands.
Animal. 2019 Apr;13(4):702-708. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118002112. Epub 2018 Sep 3.
In equines, Cr2O3 is widely accepted as an indigestible marker, but there are health concerns regarding the carcinogenic properties of Cr2O3. Recently, TiO2 has been suggested to be an alternative digestibility marker in equines. However, a comparison between Cr2O3 and TiO2 has not been made in equines. Six Welsh pony geldings (initial BW: 254±3 kg; 7 years of age) fed chopped alfalfa hay were used to evaluate the use of TiO2 (Ti) and Cr2O3 (Cr) as markers for calculating apparent digestibility and to investigate the effect of frequency of marker administration on the measurement of digestibility values. Diets contained 4.65 kg dry matter (DM) chopped alfalfa hay supplemented with minerals, vitamins, TiO2 (3.3 g Ti/day) and Cr2O3 (3.2 g Cr/day). Ponies were dosed with either 3.3 g Ti and 3.2 g Cr once daily (DF1) or with 1.65 g Ti and 1.60 g Cr twice daily (DF2). After adaptation to the diets and procedures for 14 days, voluntary voided faeces were collected quantitatively over 7 days and analysed for moisture, ash, Ti and Cr. Apparent total tract DM digestibility (DMD) and organic matter digestibility (OMD) were calculated using the total faecal collection (TFC) and marker method (Ti and Cr). The overall mean cumulative faecal recovery of Cr and Ti (as % of intake) were 102.0% and 96.6%, respectively. Mean daily faecal recoveries of Cr as well as of Ti were not different (P=0.323; P=0.808, respectively) between treatments. Overall daily faecal recovery of Cr differed (P=0.019) from 100% when the marker was dosed once daily, whereas overall daily faecal recovery was similar to 100% for both administration frequencies when Ti was used as a marker. For both markers, the coefficient of variation of the mean faecal marker recovery between horses was lower when the markers were administrated twice per day. Across treatments, cumulative DMD and OMD estimated with Ti were similar (P=0.345; P=0.418, respectively) compared with those values determined by TFC method. When Cr was used, the calculated cumulative DMD tended (P=0.097) to be greater compared with those estimated with TFC, and cumulative OMD values were overestimated (P=0.013). Orally supplemented Ti recovery in the faeces of ponies fed chopped alfalfa hay with Ti administered once or twice daily was close to 100%, making it the preferred marker for digestibility trials in equines.
在马属动物中,Cr2O3 被广泛认为是一种不可消化的标记物,但 Cr2O3 的致癌特性存在健康隐患。最近,TiO2 被提议作为马属动物中替代的可消化性标记物。然而,Cr2O3 和 TiO2 之间的比较尚未在马属动物中进行。
使用 6 匹威尔士矮种马(初始 BW:254±3 kg;7 岁)进行试验,这些马喂食切碎的紫花苜蓿干草,以评估 TiO2(Ti)和 Cr2O3(Cr)作为标记物用于计算表观消化率,并研究标记物给药频率对消化率值测量的影响。
日粮含有 4.65 kg 干物质(DM)切碎的紫花苜蓿干草,补充矿物质、维生素、TiO2(每天 3.3 g Ti)和 Cr2O3(每天 3.2 g Cr)。这些马每天接受 3.3 g Ti 和 3.2 g Cr (DF1)或每天两次接受 1.65 g Ti 和 1.60 g Cr(DF2)。
在适应日粮和程序 14 天后,连续 7 天定量收集自由排粪,并分析水分、灰分、Ti 和 Cr。使用总粪便收集(TFC)和标记物法(Ti 和 Cr)计算表观全肠道 DM 消化率(DMD)和有机物消化率(OMD)。
Cr 和 Ti 的累积粪便回收率(作为摄入量的%)分别为 102.0%和 96.6%。Cr 和 Ti 的平均日粪便回收率没有差异(P=0.323;P=0.808,分别)。当标记物每天给药一次时,Cr 的总体日粪便回收率与 100%不同(P=0.019),而当 Ti 用作标记物时,两种给药频率的总体日粪便回收率均接近 100%。对于两种标记物,当标记物每天给药两次时,马之间标记物平均粪便回收率的变异系数较低。
在所有处理中,使用 Ti 估算的累积 DMD 和 OMD 相似(P=0.345;P=0.418,分别),与通过 TFC 方法确定的值相似。当使用 Cr 时,计算的累积 DMD 与通过 TFC 估算的值相比有增加的趋势(P=0.097),而累积 OMD 值被高估(P=0.013)。
给喂食添加 Ti 的切碎紫花苜蓿干草的矮种马口服补充 Ti,每日一次或两次,粪便中 Ti 的回收率接近 100%,因此它是马属动物消化率试验的首选标记物。